Interact
Interact


BINN LADEN

Started by: rbilly (10582)

JUST BEEN ON THE RADIO .. HE AS BEEN SHOT BY AMERICAN FORCES.AND ALL.READY BEEN BURIED did not catch when it was ..

Started: 2nd May 2011 at 10:38
Last edited by rbilly: 2nd May 2011 at 23:19:34

Posted by: anthony1 (inactive)

Dec 13 2001 in Tora Bora

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 10:41

Posted by: rbilly (10582)

anthony

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 10:42

Posted by: rbilly (10582)

sorry a thread on all ready did not see it ...

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 10:45

Posted by: a proud latics supporter (inactive)

Bin Laden's bin shot

And 'disposed' of at sea

However!!!!!

You want to ask yourself this, "Have They Shot The Right Bloke"

Americans can be very 'stupid' when it comes to stuff like that, they night have shot the wrong bloke and Osama might be laughing his socks off now

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 10:50

Posted by: fossil (7484)

I thought it was another moan by peawapp about the bin men,when I saw the thread

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 10:58

Posted by: rbilly (10582)

me and me speeeeeeling tha means fossila cownt elp it if im fick hope you are well

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 11:05

Posted by: fossil (7484)

I'm very well thank you rbilly,and yourself?

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 11:09

Posted by: peawapp (5071) 

well done fossil however this isn't the good news that it would appear,because the King is dead. long live the King there will surely be 50 more just as bad if not worse than him ready to take on the mantle of Osama-bin-laden

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 11:14

Posted by: rbilly (10582)

been better fossil .but hey hoe . things are sent to try us..and boy oh boy have we been tried ..nothing that can not be fixed though .. looking forward to our jollies in a couple of months

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 11:16

Posted by: stevemul (412)

Typical good old US of A cowboys....shoot first, think later(or maybe even don´t think later ).
How do we tell the world ?.... perhaps it might be better (safer ) to say , "we have found his body" or perhaps "he was killed in a gunfight " but no, Barak Obama tells the world...."after a gunfight, the soldiers killed him "
Sounds an awful lot like cold blooded murder.
While he might have deserved no better than that, there is
nothing to gain from making an Islamic martyr of him.

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 11:50

Posted by: moodysue (inactive)

just said on the other post so im repeating myself now but I havent heard about this so im going to put sky news on

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 11:51

Posted by: jay_1 (14715) 

The pictures of the yanks celebrating it like a 'sports win' won't go down well in the arab world.

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 11:54

Posted by: anthony1 (inactive)

he was never officially accused of the tin towers

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 12:24

Posted by: whups (8747) 

i still remember those arabs jumping for joy & celebrating when the trade centre went down .i hope that guy suffered like those trapped in the trade centre.

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 12:31

Posted by: jay_1 (14715) 

whups it doesn't mean the west should act in the same way.

The guy got shot in the head not something to celebrate imo.

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 12:33

Posted by: whups (8747) 

they dont care & neither do i .he was wanted dead or alive. good riddance i say.

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 12:36
Last edited by whups: 2nd May 2011 at 12:38:54

Posted by: ©art© (6154)

Ants tin tower

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 12:39

Posted by: a proud latics supporter (inactive)

I bet Ant goes on 'Tinternet' a lot too

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 12:59

Posted by: anthony1 (inactive)

poor guy must have a crush. going out of his way to get my attention.
Sorry Art I'm not that way inclined.
Try Canal street

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 13:03

Posted by: anthony1 (inactive)

There is not a single shred of evidence connecting Bin laden to the 911 attacks.
Now what about the guy that bought the lease to the world trade centre six weeks before they were brought down.
He insured it to the hilt against a terrorist attack and made a cool 4billion.
They had to come down anyway because they were packed with asbestos.
He and his offspring worked in the towers, even breakfasted in the 'windows on the world' restraunt religiously every morning.
He and his son and daughter didn't turn up that day.

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 13:15

Posted by: a proud latics supporter (inactive)

Just seen the entire President Obama speech announcing yon mons death and by eck what a speech, no wonder the Americans came out on to the streets after listening to it

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 13:16

Posted by: walshy76 (inactive)

The guy got shot in the head not something to celebrate imo.

only a low life lying troll could come out with such crap

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 13:24

Posted by: anthony1 (inactive)

I thought a fair trial was neccesary to establish guilt before an execution

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 13:36

Posted by: ©art© (6154)

'Eh "he was never officially accused of the tin towers"
Over to you

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 13:56

Posted by: walshy76 (inactive)

he would have got a trial if he had give himself up........thankfully he didnt and now hes dead.......so good

definatley a day of celebration

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 13:56
Last edited by walshy76: 2nd May 2011 at 14:00:12

Posted by: anthony1 (inactive)

Art prove otherwise

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 14:05

Posted by: ©art© (6154)

Where's the TIN towers, is the question...Not toooo difficult for you, is it?....Eee, there's some thick folk on here

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 14:08

Posted by: jay_1 (14715) 

Ant don't attempt to use logic with the wooden headed weasel.

He doesn't have an opinion of his own..

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 14:13

Posted by: anthony1 (inactive)

where's the westwood cooling towers?
oh they're not there!! my god!!
according to you, their absence proves bin laden blew them down.
By your logic Art, Bin Laden blew the Wigan cooling towers down

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 14:16
Last edited by anthony1: 2nd May 2011 at 14:18:04

Posted by: tonker (25469) 

There's never been any cooling towers in Wigan!

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 14:21

Posted by: anthony1 (inactive)

wigan borough

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 14:22
Last edited by anthony1: 2nd May 2011 at 14:23:59

Posted by: walshy76 (inactive)

Ant don't attempt to use logic with the wooden headed weasel.

He doesn't have an opinion of his own..


but ive got plenty facts about you.......pratt

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 14:32

Posted by: jay_1 (14715) 

No denial then wooden head?

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 14:36

Posted by: walshy76 (inactive)

what stupid comments you come out with you low life lying troll.........then you wonder why no one likes you

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 14:38

Posted by: lynsta38 (44) 

There are loads of conspiracy theories regarding the Twin Towers.......how the hell are us COMMONERS guna know the truth...about anything really......folk are to easy to believe what they read and what goes out on the TV, in my opinion.......

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 14:46

Posted by: jay_1 (14715) 

Weasel when i spend my weekend nights either stalking people in pubs on my own or speaking to strangers about a person i've never met,i'll then conclude that i have no life and nobody likes me.

Until then only you and your empty life fulfills that criteria.

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 14:48
Last edited by jay_1: 2nd May 2011 at 14:53:05

Posted by: walshy76 (inactive)

fell free to back up your comments

im sure people who have lost loved ones in the war would love you to say
"The guy got shot in the head not something to celebrate imo"

to there faces but as we all no you are a coward that will never happen

i wonder what ormo would do if you said that to him when,or if you do go in the springy again

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 14:53

Posted by: jay_1 (14715) 

I've just heard someone interviewed on TV who's son was killed in 9/11 who said she wanted him taken alive and put on trial.

You really are a thicko aren't you Weasel?Probably the thickest person i've ever encountered on a message board and you're up against some stiff competition.

Nobody getting shot in the head is something to celebrate imo.

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 14:58

Posted by: walshy76 (inactive)

so youll say that if you ever go in the springy again in front of darbys mates

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 15:01

Posted by: jay_1 (14715) 

I'll say that to anyone idiot.

And you REALLY are an IDIOT.

Why don't you go and find yourself a personality,a brain and an opinion of your own.

Cos at the moment you aren't operating as a full person lad.

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 15:04

Posted by: walshy76 (inactive)

I'll say that to anyone idiot

i think we all no thats not true,not unless you could be behind a keyboard when you say it

there is no way you would go in the springy and say that stupid comment in front of darbys mates


Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 15:08

Posted by: jay_1 (14715) 

Why not?

A lot of people who go into the Springy would agree with the statement that 'anyone getting shot in the head isn't something to celebrate.'

The flags and chants of USA have done nobody any favours.I believe his young son and wife were also killed,again nothing that would get me on the streets celebrating!

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 15:11

Posted by: walshy76 (inactive)

but hes not anyone he,according to some people,his behind most of the terrorist boming all over the world

he ordered the bombings of the twin towers

a lot of soldiers,and civilians,have lost there lives because of this scum and his people

so feel free to say it next time you go in the springy

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 15:17

Posted by: jay_1 (14715) 

anyone getting shot in the head isn't something to celebrate.'

ANYONE means anyone,you really just can't grasp arguments can you?

Saddam getting his head ripped off when he was hung wasn't something to celebrate either maybe necessary for Iraq but celebrating that is wrong in my eyes.

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 15:20

Posted by: billy (26053) 

before all you laden lovers go into mourning, spare a thought for all the widows and parentless kids that this rat financed. did he hand out any civilised conditions??no he didnt, and he got his just deserts.
shame on you pacifiers. your mind set is responsible for the collapse of law and order here in the UK, if not the world.i rejoice alongside every yank, they went in and did the job our own politicaly correct hands tied forces couldnt do.
we even have lawyers in the ranks of our forces now, "making sure we play the game"

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 15:23

Posted by: walshy76 (inactive)

he was scum ..........who cares

maybe we should get another day off to celebrate

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 15:23

Posted by: billy (26053) 

with ya all the way.

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 15:26

Posted by: walshy76 (inactive)

well said billy

its a shame the local low life lying troll doesnt see it that way

but then again he is disliked

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 15:34

Posted by: susie q (1676) 

Good riddance to very bad rubbish

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 15:38

Posted by: a proud latics supporter (inactive)

I Agree good riddance cos he was a bad un alright, only thing I am upset about is that they shot him in the head, which is instantaneous death, they should have shot him where it hurts and then let him bleed to death in agony....

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 15:49

Posted by: walshy76 (inactive)

true they should have caused him maximum pain first

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 15:55

Posted by: staffbullterrier (2224)


Who said ya carnt take the bin out on a bank holiday

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 17:01

Posted by: JP1943 (276)

Fossil please read your E/MAILS I have left a meessage for you. Remember Bletchley Park? upset um then eh.!good job you didnt do it now.

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 17:32

Posted by: kenee (2105)


: staffbullterrier


Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 18:30

Posted by: staffbullterrier (2224)

if bin laden had suffered,been taken alive,taken to trial and imprisoned until his natural death,or given the death penalty,this would have made him into an even bigger martyr,probably causing a massive uprising,with unforeseen consequences......i personally think they did the best thing in killing him there and then
the thing now is,they,ve got the terrorist training camps,will a skin diving training camp be next?

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 18:44

Posted by: grandad (2082)

Good Riddance to bad rubbish, I'm with Whups on this one, he didn't deserve a christian burial, none of his victims got one.

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 19:12

Posted by: walshy76 (inactive)

where is the low life lying troll now to say

"Nobody getting shot in the head is something to celebrate"

anyone who says this is a low life

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 19:21

Posted by: jay_1 (14715) 

It's not Wafty.

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 19:33

Posted by: walshy76 (inactive)

funny theres only you thinks so

then you wonder why your so disliked

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 19:34

Posted by: eddie7457 (1594) 

So Osama and his son have been killed, gives a whole new meaning to the phrase 'Taking the bins out'.


I'll get me coat.

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 19:37

Posted by: walshy76 (inactive)

good un

but be careful cos one mon thinks "Nobody getting shot in the head is something to celebrate" even though he is scum and if you upset him he'll start coming out with personal/abusive comments that he cant back up

edited so mr unpopular doesnt get upset and go missing for days

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 19:41
Last edited by walshy76: 2nd May 2011 at 20:42:55

Posted by: jay_1 (14715) 

TOM radio five said Bin Laden was killed along with his youngest wife and son.Also two of bin ladens aids were killed.

Off BBC NEWS.

'The officials described the operation as a "surgical raid" and said three adult males, including Bin Laden's adult son, were killed. But, they added, a woman who was being used as a shield was also killed.

According to local residents speaking to BBC Urdu the forces conducting the operation later emerged from the compound, possibly with somebody who had been inside'

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 19:43
Last edited by jay_1: 2nd May 2011 at 19:45:16

Posted by: jay_1 (14715) 

I wish the Weasel would check the facts before embarrassing himself on so many subjects.

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 19:46

Posted by: walshy76 (inactive)

I wish the Weasel would check the facts before embarrassing himself on so many subjects

just stating what you normally do when you get upset and dont get your own way.............which is most of the time really

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 19:55

Posted by: jay_1 (14715) 

Wafty makes a fool of himself again,no wonder he gets so upset.

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 19:56

Posted by: walshy76 (inactive)

keep grasping

that smells back

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 20:01

Posted by: jay_1 (14715) 

'but be careful cos one mon thinks he didnt deserve it and if you upset him he'll start coming out with personal/abusive comments that he cant back up'

Where did i say he didn't deserve it?

The Weasel lying again.

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 20:13

Posted by: joseph 1 (inactive)

If Bin Laden had been reading this on here he would have topped himself anyroad.

Come on get a grip lads!

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 20:33

Posted by: walshy76 (inactive)

if you thought he deserved it troll you would have been celebrating like everyone else

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 20:35

Posted by: jay_1 (14715) 

'but be careful cos one mon thinks he didnt deserve it and if you upset him he'll start coming out with personal/abusive comments that he cant back up'

Where did i say he didn't deserve it?'

Whenever you're ready lad...

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 20:43

Posted by: walshy76 (inactive)

then why are you not celebrating

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 20:44

Posted by: jay_1 (14715) 

'but be careful cos one mon thinks he didnt deserve it and if you upset him he'll start coming out with personal/abusive comments that he cant back up'

Where did i say he didn't deserve it?'

Whenever you're ready lad...'

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 20:45

Posted by: walshy76 (inactive)

is this were you keep repeating yourself because thats the best you can do

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 20:46

Posted by: jay_1 (14715) 

Just waiting for you to point out where i said Bin Laden didn't deserve it..

Whenever you're ready..

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 20:51

Posted by: walshy76 (inactive)

i think thats a yes.......so predictable

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 20:52

Posted by: jay_1 (14715) 

I think you've been caught out lying,AGAIN.

You also don't understand the difference between the words 'celebrate' and 'deserve'.

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 20:55

Posted by: walshy76 (inactive)

and you dont understand the diffrence between "calling someone a racist" and proving it

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 20:57

Posted by: jay_1 (14715) 

Desperate answer,you're totally beat again.

You shouldn't make it this easy...i take it you'll be back stalking me in the Springy soon.

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 21:00

Posted by: walshy76 (inactive)

not desperate

just waiting for you to prove i and other members are racist


i would come in the springy the next time im in pem but you would just make another excuse up

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 21:05

Posted by: jay_1 (14715) 

I've pointed out on numerous occasions posts and positions i believe are racist but i fully understand you may be too thick to understand these arguments.Show me a thread where i've stated you are a racist and i'll explain why.

You on the other hand on this thread still can't tell me where i've said Bin Laden didn't deserve what happened to him..

I'll wait..

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 21:09

Posted by: walshy76 (inactive)

Posted by: jay_1 (5791)
Homophobic to go along with racist.

Keep going Wafty.

Replied: 8th Apr 2010 at 19:30

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 21:13

Posted by: jay_1 (14715) 

Where is the thread?

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 21:14

Posted by: walshy76 (inactive)

who cares

thats what you said about me

the proof is in the pudding....as they say

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 21:17

Posted by: jay_1 (14715) 

Ha..

I read the thread.

The racist part was obviously referring to other posts you were making at the time,the homophobic part was referring to another post on the thread.

So when did i say Bin Laden didn't deserve what happened to him..

Go on lad..whenever you're ready.

Try and a be original..bet you can't be.

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 21:19

Posted by: walshy76 (inactive)

thats it try and laugh it off

to late damage as been done now

plenty more where that came from

low life lying troll

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 21:21

Posted by: jay_1 (14715) 



Are you wired right?

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 21:31

Posted by: buzybee (2660)

THOUGHT THEY DIDN'T TAKE OUT BINS ON A BANK HOLIDAY !!!

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 21:56

Posted by: the_gwim_weaper (inactive)

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 22:04

Posted by: joseph 1 (inactive)

You handbagers you!

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 22:30

Posted by: bassman (3591)

Welcome to the Walshy and Jay show...again.

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 22:41

Posted by: joseph 1 (inactive)

This has just been on Handbags, now it's back here.

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 22:43
Last edited by joseph 1: 3rd May 2011 at 11:47:39

Posted by: bassman (3591)

Which makes the show twice as bad J.

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 22:44

Posted by: rosbott (198) 

Why don't you walshy & jay1 put each other on IGNORE, I've never read so much crap from both of you in all my life, you ruin every thread with your personal vendetta that spoils it for everyone else. Get a life both of you.

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 22:57

Posted by: kopitesere (inactive)

He's a gonna hurrrrrrrayyy !!

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 23:21

Posted by: custard (6951) 

Kopit, if hes been missing for what? Ten years, why didn,t they show his body?

Me thinks something fishy is going on..

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 23:25

Posted by: kopitesere (inactive)

I don't no custard i've thought that today,but the yanks have so called killed him so they must have seen the body

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 23:45

Posted by: custard (6951) 

So why dump it in the sea?

Replied: 2nd May 2011 at 23:58

Posted by: kopitesere (inactive)

I no has someone got his will to hand & carried out his wishes.

Replied: 3rd May 2011 at 00:13

Posted by: ecmdj (8186) 

after the scenario last night between jay and walshy ,how refreshing to have fresh names and input ,woke up early, and thought should i go on here ,so as you can see i did , custard and kop, thanks for changing the ruddy tune on here.

Replied: 3rd May 2011 at 05:34

Posted by: walshy76 (inactive)

rosbott

i have asked the troll umpteen times to take this argument off site and sort it via email but as he is a coward he wont do it so i cant do much more and if you keep using this site you will see how big of a coward he his

as for it being crap you might not bother about people coming out with personal untrue comments or calling you a racist but i do and this will go one until the low life lying troll can back everything up or apologise which hes not man enough to do

for me this cant happen quick enough but because of the type of person he his i doubt it will happen

on here at 05.34.....ummmmm

Replied: 3rd May 2011 at 08:59

Posted by: anthony1 (inactive)

Replied: 3rd May 2011 at 09:23
Last edited by anthony1: 3rd May 2011 at 09:24:46

Posted by: billy (26053) 

dna proves its the rat.
we can thank this sub human fer one thing....he refused to surrender. thanks rat.
would have been a diff story if captured, imagin if you can, if the brits had done this operation and took him alive, he would now be living in the lap of luxury on our taxes, and training our home spun radicals on dartmoor.
blessings in disguise or what? thanks USA, the world owes ya.

Replied: 3rd May 2011 at 10:18

Posted by: anthony1 (inactive)

I take it you have seen the results of the test.
Oh I see Obama, the one with the fake birth certificate told you so.

Replied: 3rd May 2011 at 10:37

Posted by: billy (26053) 

question fer ye ant.....how come ya question anything brit or yank???yet grasp at anything the radicals claim????your a strange owd bird.

Replied: 3rd May 2011 at 10:52

Posted by: billy (26053) 

say whut???

Replied: 3rd May 2011 at 10:53

Posted by: anthony1 (inactive)

I just don't like my intelligence being insulted.
Let me get this right, they slaughter hundreds of thousands of people most of them civilians in two countries, three if you count Pakistan.
They take a pop at him a every opportunity that presents itself, even if it means blowing up a restraunt full of civvies.
And now they get all sensitive to the man, giving him a proper burial in the islamic tradition.
But it's at sea so nothing can be verified
You'd think after what they say he did, they would wrap him in a pigs carcass and let him rot dangling from a crane at ground zero

Replied: 3rd May 2011 at 11:11

Posted by: anthony1 (inactive)

I mean no autopsy?
no inquest?
we must have slipped into a parallel universe.
alice in wonderland

Replied: 3rd May 2011 at 11:18

Posted by: anthony1 (inactive)

by the way, they now have an excuse to attack pakistan

Replied: 3rd May 2011 at 11:23

Posted by: joseph 1 (inactive)

On a mission to clear his good name Ant? No matter how many ridiculous theories or conspiracies you Google and come up with it won't wash, no one cares about the slaughter or collateral damage caused to those others, it's all irelevant, and folk will care even less about Bin Laden now justice has been done. As for Pakistan who cares?

Replied: 3rd May 2011 at 11:46

Posted by: anthony1 (inactive)

I don't care for bin laden at all,
This woman would like to know

Stella Olender, who lost her daughter Christine in the September 11 attacks, said she was not sure that bin Laden was really dead.
"To me, that seems strange, that they disposed of it and no one [besides] whoever was right there knows what happened, if it's true or false, you know?" she said.


they paraded Saddam's dead sons around to prove they were dead - why do you suppose they hastily buried this version of OBL at sea?

Replied: 3rd May 2011 at 11:55
Last edited by anthony1: 3rd May 2011 at 11:56:54

Posted by: ©art© (6154)

Bin-Gone

Link

Replied: 3rd May 2011 at 12:11

Posted by: anthony1 (inactive)

and that's proof positive?
based on that I shudder to think how many times you've been taken to the cleaners

Replied: 3rd May 2011 at 12:18

Posted by: tony g (295)

Osama Bin Laden joke time

A Shark by the name of Enoch is swimming around in the sea minding his own business when he sees Osama sink to the bottom of the sea, Enoch says, for f__k sake, you let one in, you"ll let them all in.

Replied: 3rd May 2011 at 12:19

Posted by: hughes the booze (2189)

hes bin laid on.

Replied: 3rd May 2011 at 12:27

Posted by: anthony1 (inactive)

Replied: 3rd May 2011 at 13:54

Posted by: staffbullterrier (2224)

bet he wishes he hadn,t filled that cencus form in

Replied: 3rd May 2011 at 16:37
Last edited by staffbullterrier: 3rd May 2011 at 16:38:34

Posted by: billy (26053) 

the rat hid behind his wife???whats up??didnt he want the 72 virgins awaiting him????

Replied: 3rd May 2011 at 16:46

Posted by: the_gwim_weaper (inactive)

Bin Laden's having the last laugh... He's up there going through his 72 virgins like there is no tomorrow.

Replied: 3rd May 2011 at 16:49

Posted by: steff63 (2239)

Pakistan is supposedly a third world country,

But at least they get their Bins taken out on a bank holiday

Replied: 3rd May 2011 at 17:38

Posted by: ahcawntspeyk (5907)

Posted by: anthony1 (2298)
I just don't like my intelligence being insulted



So why do you believe every conspiracy theory ever published then




Posted by: anthony1 (2298)
There is not a single shred of evidence connecting Bin laden to the 911 attacks





And you know this how anthony? Do all the major intelligence agencies worldwide share their information with you? I think not. And whether there is or isn't is totally irrelevant, the FACT is he was the leader of one of the most radical bunch of terrorists the world has ever known, a group who make no secret of attrocities they have commited, and make no secret of their intentions to make the world totally islamic, he deserved to be butchered,
he is no loss to the world,.. Good riddance.

Replied: 3rd May 2011 at 17:54

Posted by: xxstuartxx (5799)

The truth's not out there yet, is he dead, was he unceremoniously dumped overboard for fish food, or is he still alive? The truth is we'll not know for months, years, perhaps even decades, what really happened.

Replied: 3rd May 2011 at 18:31

Posted by: dazzylatic (788)

Before monday very few had heard about islamabad. The same goes for abattobad. But we've known westhamabad all season

Replied: 3rd May 2011 at 18:31

Posted by: farrie50 (1710) 

that should be on the sports board dazzy

Replied: 3rd May 2011 at 23:07

Posted by: black staff (inactive)

by Anthony1...
<<There is not a single shred of evidence connecting Bin laden to the 911 attacks.>>

What planet have you been living Bro? It is not my intent to insult your intelligence, but please do not insult mine.

Bin Laden himself on video described how he funded and helped to plan the attack... he even took credit for the idea that a major fire on some of the floors would bring down the building.... all there in his own words.

By the way Autopsy in against the Islamic faith, that is why no autopsy. But having said that how do we know there was no autopsy anyway? There is still time for an inquest, the inquest into Diana's death took place years after the event.

Replied: 4th May 2011 at 06:45
Last edited by black staff: 4th May 2011 at 09:15:27

Posted by: ruddy duck (inactive)

Whe will the movie being coming out?

Replied: 4th May 2011 at 08:51

Posted by: billy (26053) 

unlikelt to be donald duck?????

Replied: 4th May 2011 at 08:57

Posted by: anthony1 (inactive)

black staff
are you seriously suggesting that if a muslim dies in suspicious circumstances they won't perform an autopsy to establish cause of death?

The video you mentioned, is that one of those that the CIA admitted to faking
cia admits faking bin laden vid

ne bin laden confession tape fake like the rest

He has denied it however
Bin laden denies involvement

Let me ask you a question.
While all this has been passing you by.
What planet have you been on

If he is responsible then he deserves what he gets or got.
If he wasn't involved, then there are murderers still at large that aren't being brought to justice.

Replied: 4th May 2011 at 10:33
Last edited by anthony1: 4th May 2011 at 10:52:18

Posted by: black staff (inactive)

Oh now give me a break... the you provide links to sites that are for conspiracy theorist.... where facts are taken out context, and if the facts don't support them they make them up. The video I refereed to was in fact genuine, I am not talking about crackpot ideas from crackpot sites. ESPECIALLY ONE THAT ADMONISHES ME WITH A QUOTE FROM THE QUR'AN AT THE VERY TOP OF THE PAGE.

You are quite clearly a lover of the conspiracy theory, which is your right. It is also clear that if people don't agree with these crackpot theories they must be gullible fools who believe everything they are told. Which is utterly irony when you get right down and think about it.

Here is a hard truth, I am quite ready to believe that Governments play dirty tricks, that they can be very underhand and manipulate the truth. But... YOU don't know when they do it... NOBODY knows when they do it, until such time they want you to know. They are WAY too clever for either me or you. The very fact this latest theory is actually on the internet where it can be read by anyone means that it is all rubbish. It is all opinion, that followers of crackpot theories are reporting as fact... and changing the truth to fit.

Replied: 4th May 2011 at 13:57
Last edited by black staff: 4th May 2011 at 14:09:38

Posted by: redcurl (37) 

Im with you Anthony1, Too many people with their heads in the sand.

Replied: 4th May 2011 at 14:22

Posted by: black staff (inactive)

^^^^^^
You see that is what I dislike.... just because I don't agree with a certain theory 'my head is in the sand'. I have never yet BLINDLY believed anything I have seen in the media... I always question it. But in this case after reading the reports I do not think there is anything underhand... it is all there and reported. I agree there may be certain facts not yet reported, but not because we are being fooled.

But some people have to have a conspiracy.

Replied: 4th May 2011 at 14:38

Posted by: anthony1 (inactive)

it was a random site refering to a mainstream article, the washington post the bbc also did a story about the possibility of the confession tape being faked.

I agree that most of the time we don't know whats going on, these peopl know their stuff and use the media to their advantage when dealing with the masses.

But there are sure to be conspiracy theories when there are so many holes in the official version, and they certainly can't be ignored.
as i said in another thread the families of the 911 victims want answers, they aren't conspiracy theorists.
It must hurt and distress them so much when their most valid concerns are being dismissed as 'conspiracy theories'

Replied: 4th May 2011 at 14:42

Posted by: black staff (inactive)

The Washington Post link is not to an editorial posted in the newspaper, or even on it's online newsfeed... the link is to a blog in which one person is giving his opinion, and quoting unsubstantiated material. It is his right, everyone has a right of opinion, but that does not make it fact.

And yet... Ascertain the Trust says...

The details are outlined in a Washington Post article by investigative reporter and former Army Intelligence case officer Jeff Stein.

It is NOT an articlein the news sense, but a blog posting.

Replied: 5th May 2011 at 12:13

Posted by: anthony1 (inactive)

Do you think the confession tape is authentic?

Replied: 5th May 2011 at 12:22

Posted by: black staff (inactive)

Well, for a start the one I saw reported in the news was not sat around a camp-fire, it was in a cave and was released just a week or so after 9/11... and I have seen no reason not to believe it authentic. I will see if I can hunt it down.

Replied: 5th May 2011 at 12:42

Posted by: anthony1 (inactive)

What bothers me about these vids is he denied involvement just days after the attacks
CNN
I haven't seen the 'cave' vid you refer to but the others are very suspect.
You'd think they could make a clear one with good sound.
he can afford the equipement

Replied: 5th May 2011 at 12:53
Last edited by anthony1: 5th May 2011 at 12:55:48

Posted by: black staff (inactive)

However, the vast majority of the 9/11 high-jackers had been to Afghanistan for training at an Al Quada camp, they had either met Bin Laden, or one of his generals. The very nature of Al Quada is that they operate as separate cells... with almost total autonomy. It MAY be true Bin Laden was not directly involved in execution, but his organisation WAS involved in the training and indoctrination... and may have FUNDED them. But it was an Al Quada cell committed the act, and he was Al Quada's supreme leader. Pedantics and semantics aside, without his organization the attacks would not have happened. He MUST share respnsibility.

See for yourself, you will see that almost all the high-jackers had a link with Al Quada... some very strong links.

Replied: 5th May 2011 at 13:08

Posted by: the_gwim_weaper (inactive)

Replied: 5th May 2011 at 13:09

Posted by: anthony1 (inactive)

There are at least six of them still alive (hijackers}, and have given interviews denying involement
bbc

What does that say?

Replied: 5th May 2011 at 13:12
Last edited by anthony1: 5th May 2011 at 13:15:25

Posted by: black staff (inactive)

It says it must definitely a daft conspiracy theory.... where are these people now? I have seen this before, and is usually put forward as 'conclusive' proof either the US or Mossad carried out the attacks and framed these poor innocent souls.

But here is the flaw... they TURN up alive!

If the US or Israel HAD carried out the attacks and had chosen their 'patsies' there is no way in hell they could just turn up alive. But I bet a lot of look-a-likes came out of the woodwork to get their 15 minutes.

On September 23, 2001 BBC News reported that Waleed was "alive and well" in Casablanca, Morocco and was talking to multiple media organizations;[22][23] however, due to confusion over the man's identity, and editorial concerns over conspiracy theories, BBC News later modified the September 23 report by inserting "A man called ... "[22] BBC News considers the September 23 report superseded by an October 5, 2001 report that lists Waleed as one of the alleged hijackers believed by the FBI to be responsible for the September 11 attacks.

Replied: 5th May 2011 at 13:31
Last edited by black staff: 5th May 2011 at 13:32:30

Posted by: anthony1 (inactive)

there we go again, that old conspiracy theory chestnut

Replied: 5th May 2011 at 13:39
Last edited by anthony1: 5th May 2011 at 13:41:17

Posted by: black staff (inactive)

... there we go again, the old 'Page not found' chestnut.

Replied: 5th May 2011 at 13:50

Posted by: anthony1 (inactive)

On September 23, 2001 BBC News reported that Waleed was "alive and well" in Casablanca, Morocco and was talking to multiple media organizations;[22][23] however, due to confusion over the man's identity, and editorial concerns over conspiracy theories, BBC News later modified the September 23 report by inserting "A man called ... "[22] BBC News considers the September 23 report superseded by an October 5, 2001 report that lists Waleed as one of the alleged hijackers believed by the FBI to be responsible for the September 11 attacks.

That doesn't say anything
just that it maintains he was one of the hijackers.
he says he isn't

Replied: 5th May 2011 at 18:15
Last edited by anthony1: 5th May 2011 at 18:17:21

Posted by: madamehmurray (6265) 

eems that the nightmare is o ver. Maybe the nightmare is just beginning

Replied: 7th May 2011 at 15:13

 

Note: You must login to use this feature.

If you haven't registered, why not join now?. Registration is free.