Login   |   Register   |   

Rumour

Started by: grimshaw (3999) 

Going around that a well known football player who plays for a team not a million miles away from the emptihad is in deep sh.t for allegedly hiring a private plane to attend a party in london recently causing a recent spurs game to be postponed .
Just saying like .

Started: 31st Dec 2020 at 18:15

Posted by: laughing gravy (inactive)

didnt tiger recently make a claim you agreed with saying it was a sham city players had covid? therefor it cant be a city player!

just saying like.... lets see you squirm out of that one...

Replied: 31st Dec 2020 at 18:31

Posted by: grimshaw (3999) 

Squirm out of what .?.
No comment on the player then who hired a plane .
Allegedly .

Replied: 31st Dec 2020 at 18:53

Posted by: laughing gravy (inactive)

read tigers thread you agreed when tiger insinuated city players DID NOT have covid,now your saying one gave it to spurs MAKE YOUR MIND UP they either had it or didnt...

Replied: 31st Dec 2020 at 18:59

Posted by: grimshaw (3999) 

You need to read tigers post again .
Try to keep up .

Replied: 31st Dec 2020 at 19:14

Posted by: broady (inactive)

With his surname you thought he may have got there by a different method.

Replied: 31st Dec 2020 at 20:58

Posted by: chatty (9771)

If this rumour is correct he needs the book throwing at him and banning sine die, it will be the third time he has been caught breaking social distancing rules ( So god knows how many times he actually has)

Can't wait for the bloke who..... "is not the one to make light of a serious issue.".....tells us what he thinks he should get?

Replied: 31st Dec 2020 at 21:05
Last edited by chatty: 31st Dec 2020 at 21:23:57

Posted by: 0 years (inactive)

.

Replied: 31st Dec 2020 at 21:38
Last edited by 0 years: 4th Jan 2021 at 00:33:58

Posted by: chatty (9771)

Didn't take long for me to smoke the guy who's got me on "ignore" (yea right) out

Replied: 31st Dec 2020 at 21:55

Posted by: 0 years (inactive)

.

Replied: 31st Dec 2020 at 22:05
Last edited by 0 years: 4th Jan 2021 at 00:34:14

Posted by: chatty (9771)

I don't need "acknowledegments",
people coming clean and not bullsh#tting about having me on "ignore' (yea right) because they can't answer questions about their club means a lot more

Replied: 31st Dec 2020 at 22:29

Posted by: grimshaw (3999) 

Oyears.
Funny you mention comics.
Last comic i read was a bertie match day programme from a year ago which my M C pal sent me along with the excellent united we stand fanzine .
L M A O at the programme so much i did think of taking up a subscription.

Replied: 1st Jan 2021 at 12:43

Posted by: laughing gravy (inactive)

chatty/grimshaw re covid breakers i've been searching for your posts condemning mason greenwood but cant seem to find any could you please point me in the right direction..

Replied: 1st Jan 2021 at 13:22

Posted by: gaffer (7965) 

Replied: 1st Jan 2021 at 13:35

Posted by: Tiger cat (1132) 

Walker should be thrown out of football, has pep got a pair to do it, always thought he was overrated anyway.

Replied: 1st Jan 2021 at 14:09

Posted by: laughing gravy (inactive)

as should greenwood has ole geet the balls to do it?

Replied: 1st Jan 2021 at 14:17

Posted by: laughing gravy (inactive)

now i think of it tiger could you also show me your condemnation of greenwood also...

Replied: 1st Jan 2021 at 14:21

Posted by: 0 years (inactive)

.

Replied: 1st Jan 2021 at 14:33
Last edited by 0 years: 4th Jan 2021 at 00:34:34

Posted by: chatty (9771)

Mason Greenwood was on England duty at the time (so Ole's sphericals don't come into it ) and was punished and rightly so.
Now off you go back to the drawing board (internet) to try and dig up something else!

Replied: 1st Jan 2021 at 14:59

Posted by: grimshaw (3999) 

You make me chuckle oyears .
Terrific .
Keep up the good work .

Replied: 1st Jan 2021 at 15:01

Posted by: chatty (9771)

The sort of common sense that should have led to trafford putting Cantona and Maguire up for sale.

According to the link posted if true this will be Walkers FOURTH breach of the rules, so why hasn't he been put "up for sale"?

Replied: 1st Jan 2021 at 15:03

Posted by: laughing gravy (inactive)

still no word on them greenwood condemnation posts then you two?

Replied: 1st Jan 2021 at 15:29

Posted by: chatty (9771)

Which part of "was punished and rightly so" are you failing to comprehend?

Replied: 1st Jan 2021 at 15:45

Posted by: Tiger cat (1132) 

Replied: 1st Jan 2021 at 15:55

Posted by: laughing gravy (inactive)

eh? that was posted after the question i'm not psychic...laugh at that suckholer...

Replied: 1st Jan 2021 at 16:19

Posted by: GOLDEN BEAR (6556) 

On another theme the Cavani episode is a travesty not only punished once but 3 times yet when it happened last year the fine for that player was a mere £50k and one match ban end off! but Cavani £100k fine ,3 match ban and to attend a course justice no way !

Replied: 2nd Jan 2021 at 14:32

Posted by: grimshaw (3999) 

Look at what club the player you speak of plays for G B..
Tells you everything .

Replied: 2nd Jan 2021 at 15:08

Posted by: 0 years (inactive)



.

Replied: 2nd Jan 2021 at 15:40
Last edited by 0 years: 4th Jan 2021 at 00:35:02

Posted by: laughing gravy (inactive)

Replied: 2nd Jan 2021 at 16:03

Posted by: laughing gravy (inactive)

0years chatty wont comment hes too busy squirming not answering questions...

Replied: 2nd Jan 2021 at 16:05

Posted by: 0 years (inactive)

.

Replied: 2nd Jan 2021 at 16:47
Last edited by 0 years: 4th Jan 2021 at 00:35:22

Posted by: chatty (9771)

Eh why should any of us feel "stupid"?
I haven't a clue what that story has got to do with that half wit Walker?
Are you inferring that this was the rumoured party doing the rounds that Walker was linked to and he had nothing to do with it? (Or is it a case of "see others are doing it too?)
Well if that's the case he's only broken the lockdown rules on THREE occasions and not FOUR, that's ok then!!!!

Replied: 2nd Jan 2021 at 17:04
Last edited by chatty: 2nd Jan 2021 at 17:09:14

Posted by: laughing gravy (inactive)

asterisk not answering then? perhaps this little ditty will jog your memory

Replied: 2nd Jan 2021 at 17:10

Posted by: 0 years (inactive)

.

Replied: 2nd Jan 2021 at 17:13
Last edited by 0 years: 4th Jan 2021 at 00:36:01

Posted by: chatty (9771)

So is it THREE times or FOUR times then that Walker's broken the covid lockdown rules, I'm confused?
And how many does it have to be before you stop defending him?

Replied: 2nd Jan 2021 at 17:18

Posted by: 0 years (inactive)

.

Replied: 2nd Jan 2021 at 17:21
Last edited by 0 years: 4th Jan 2021 at 00:35:42

Posted by: chatty (9771)

Another year but the same old story, still struggling to "ignore" me then.

Replied: 2nd Jan 2021 at 17:23

Posted by: 0 years (inactive)

.

Replied: 2nd Jan 2021 at 17:23
Last edited by 0 years: 4th Jan 2021 at 00:36:54

Posted by: chatty (9771)

You 've got me on "ignore"(yea right) yet respond to my post's but I'm the "dog with the bone"????

Replied: 2nd Jan 2021 at 17:30

Posted by: 0 years (inactive)

.

Replied: 2nd Jan 2021 at 17:31
Last edited by 0 years: 4th Jan 2021 at 00:36:30

Posted by: chatty (9771)

Come on then judge gives us your wisdom, how many times as the serial Covid rule breaker done it, is it THREE or FOUR times then?

Replied: 2nd Jan 2021 at 17:37

Posted by: 0 years (inactive)

Chatty, have you had your vaccination yet?

If not you must have it ASAP, Distemper is such a nasty virus don't you know, all puppies should have it!

Replied: 2nd Jan 2021 at 17:39

Posted by: chatty (9771)

That's a bit rich from the bloke with OCD, puts me on 'ignore' (yea right) but still cant stop replying.

Go on then, over to you

Replied: 2nd Jan 2021 at 17:56

Posted by: 0 years (inactive)

Where have you been, I thought you had got lost chasing that last ball.

You must be lapping up all this attention Chatty, now stop bouncing up and down, there's a good boy, you're getting too excitable.

Replied: 2nd Jan 2021 at 17:59

Posted by: chatty (9771)

No, looking at the gap between the two front runners and the rest of the League is the thing that gets me excitable these days

Replied: 2nd Jan 2021 at 18:11

Posted by: 0 years (inactive)

.

Replied: 2nd Jan 2021 at 18:12
Last edited by 0 years: 4th Jan 2021 at 00:33:44

Posted by: chatty (9771)

Where's that 'mind the gap' thread gone you used to be keen on?

Replied: 2nd Jan 2021 at 18:15

Posted by: 0 years (inactive)

.

Replied: 2nd Jan 2021 at 18:18
Last edited by 0 years: 4th Jan 2021 at 00:33:26

Posted by: chatty (9771)

Didn't I tell you once before, form is temporary class is permanent?

Replied: 2nd Jan 2021 at 18:21

Posted by: 0 years (inactive)

.

Replied: 2nd Jan 2021 at 18:24
Last edited by 0 years: 4th Jan 2021 at 00:33:08

Posted by: chatty (9771)

"IGNORE" verb:
refuse to take notice of or acknowledge; disregard intentionally.

Anyhow had enough of your inability to do as you say, i'm off bye!
PS. Mind the gap.

Replied: 2nd Jan 2021 at 18:26
Last edited by chatty: 2nd Jan 2021 at 18:27:25

Posted by: 0 years (inactive)

.

Replied: 2nd Jan 2021 at 18:27
Last edited by 0 years: 4th Jan 2021 at 00:32:46

Posted by: 0 years (inactive)


.


Replied: 2nd Jan 2021 at 18:37
Last edited by 0 years: 4th Jan 2021 at 00:32:18

Posted by: 0 years (inactive)

.

Replied: 2nd Jan 2021 at 23:18
Last edited by 0 years: 4th Jan 2021 at 00:31:57

Posted by: chatty (9771)

Dear me how embarrassing, after trying to defend the indefensible ( still not sure if it's THREE or FOUR times that Kyle Walker has broke the rules) and muddy the waters with a link to a story of someone elses player breaking the rules and then asking a group on here " how stupid do you feel now"!
He now has get in first and post an addendum to his previous drivel and try to take the sting out of another possible City player breach.
Obvious question then: How stupid do YOU feel now?

Replied: 3rd Jan 2021 at 08:55

Posted by: Tiger cat (1132) 

Another knockout blow for 0years, hope he has not got a dog.

Replied: 3rd Jan 2021 at 10:02

Posted by: laughing gravy (inactive)

if i were chatty i'd be embarrassed if a suckholer kept hanging of my coattail's but thats were we differ i would never allow such antics while chatty wallows in your brown nosing....

Replied: 3rd Jan 2021 at 10:08

Posted by: grimshaw (3999) 

Oyears.
Its becoming most embarrassing now.
You are taking a right beating from chatty.
You simply cant compete .
I am reminded of the words of the great Mohamed Ali who said Joe Frazier was so easy to hit he got mad when you missed him.
Chuck the towel in before chatty inflicts more pain.

Replied: 3rd Jan 2021 at 10:20

Posted by: laughing gravy (inactive)

HAHAHAHA says the mon who cornt spell muhammad ali reet cue the edit..

Replied: 3rd Jan 2021 at 10:30

Posted by: laughing gravy (inactive)

grim was mohamed ali the asian heavyweight who beat joe jalfrazi?...

Replied: 3rd Jan 2021 at 10:52
Last edited by laughing gravy: 3rd Jan 2021 at 11:00:17

Posted by: chatty (9771)

We should thank our lucky stars, imagine stuck in the trenches relying on them to watch our backs...
One came up with:

Chatty you win I'm out of here!
"..0years sorry but for my own sanity i have to leave you to fight alone...."

And the other sticks his head in the sand and puts people on "ignore"(yea right) when things get a little hotter!

Replied: 3rd Jan 2021 at 11:22

Posted by: laughing gravy (inactive)

but i came back when he needed back up,unlike you i wont leave folk to be bullied.

Replied: 3rd Jan 2021 at 11:36
Last edited by laughing gravy: 3rd Jan 2021 at 11:37:19

Posted by: whups (13256) 

which makes you the biggest billy liar on here .

Replied: 3rd Jan 2021 at 11:42

Posted by: laughing gravy (inactive)

go and read the message ive left for you...

Replied: 3rd Jan 2021 at 11:43

Posted by: grimshaw (3999) 

Have a couple of easy rounds chatty .
You are dishing out a right posting .
For sure they are gluttons for punishment .

Replied: 3rd Jan 2021 at 11:44

Posted by: chatty (9771)

Boll%cks he "needed you" when you was buggering off

Replied: 3rd Jan 2021 at 11:44

Posted by: laughing gravy (inactive)

eyup chatty more suckholin for you to wallow in..

Replied: 3rd Jan 2021 at 11:45

Posted by: whups (13256) 

you suckhole up to 0yrs.

Replied: 3rd Jan 2021 at 12:58

Posted by: 0 years (inactive)

.

Replied: 3rd Jan 2021 at 15:09
Last edited by 0 years: 4th Jan 2021 at 00:31:28

Posted by: laughing gravy (inactive)

0years chatty conveniently left out the KEY part of my post to try and put me down heres the original
0years sorry but for my own sanity i have to leave you to fight alone,but you have proved time and again your very capable of doing so..

heres what chatty posted

We should thank our lucky stars, imagine stuck in the trenches relying on them to watch our backs...
One came up with:

Chatty you win I'm out of here!
"..0years sorry but for my own sanity i have to leave you to fight alone...."

And the other sticks his head in the sand and puts people on "ignore"(yea right) when things get a little hotter!

Replied: 3rd Jan 2021 at 15:26

Posted by: 0 years (inactive)

.

Replied: 3rd Jan 2021 at 15:40
Last edited by 0 years: 4th Jan 2021 at 00:30:53

Posted by: laughing gravy (inactive)

oh i can assure you i dont whats laughable is he keeps saying you dodge questions while continuously dodging guess what? himselftheres definately a crust or two missing with him,i bet hes sat theer now waiting for his minnions to come suckholin...

Replied: 3rd Jan 2021 at 15:54

Posted by: 0 years (inactive)

.

Replied: 3rd Jan 2021 at 16:01
Last edited by 0 years: 4th Jan 2021 at 00:30:30

Posted by: Tiger cat (1132) 

My my, chatty got 0 years tied in that many knots he as started deleting his own posts.

Replied: 4th Jan 2021 at 04:29

Posted by: chatty (9771)

Wasn't it a thread saying how that idiot had "got my measure"?
With the timing of the deletion it looks like an exercise in self preservation, he has seen the thread on the Generalboard and realised even he can only defend the indefensible for so long and it would damage him to be seen giving any support to that buffon whatsoever any longer, so he has pulled it.

Replied: 4th Jan 2021 at 07:14

Posted by: 0 years (inactive)

Wrong TC, simply a new approach.

Replied: 4th Jan 2021 at 14:00
Last edited by 0 years: 4th Jan 2021 at 14:03:08

Posted by: GOLDEN BEAR (6556) 

CAN SOMEONE EXPLAIN WHY ::O YEARS KEEPS POSTING BLANK SCREENS ?? HAS HE FORGOT WHTA TO WRITE OR SAY ?????

Replied: 4th Jan 2021 at 14:37

Posted by: 0 years (inactive)

I deleted all my recent posts GB.

Replied: 4th Jan 2021 at 16:13

Posted by: whups (13256) 

the mans a true pillock alan ,that,s why . he can give it but cant take it.

Replied: 6th Jan 2021 at 01:31

 

Note: You must login to use this feature.

If you haven't registered, why not join now?. Registration is free.