Has The Southport Thread Been Removed,?

I can't find it? I know Stardelta was asked for his opinion and then subsequently removed for giving his opinion
In my opinion Ozy typed a lot of truth in this.
Posted below by Ozy on photo a day regarding the thread.

"I’d like to make it clear that I don’t necessarily always agree with Stardelta’s views … in fact , I find many of his posts , particularly on the topic of immigration for example , to be tediously inflexible at times , but the bloke ,
( at least I assume it’s a bloke ) , comes across to me as being both intelligent and articulate. Both virtues combined being a relatively rare combination on this site.

"But where’s the benefit from banning him from the site ? … it’s censorship … nothing less .
We constantly bleat on about censorship in North Korea and various other left wing or communist countries , yet choose to bar a bloke from speaking his mind on a bloody tinpot Wiggin social media site for Christ's sake ."

…" Jesus wept ….can you see the irony here Ron ?"

"It’s blatant censorship ,
nothing more nor less ."

"I suppose this post may also be subject to censorship … time will tell ".

Regards . Ozy .

Yes Chesh I posted on it about ten minutes ago, to say what a grand job the locals were doing after yesterdays riots.

Probably removed because someone has ended up with egg on ones face?
It's never a good idea to "shoot from the hip with a knee jerk reaction" so to speak.
Its's always better to think things out , first

And before anyone jumps to the wrong conclusion about my opinion, I am 100% anti immigration and I hate what our country has become due to the freeloaders entering it

Cheshire Cat

I appreciate what you say as regards immigration etc, but when an admin removes a topic, you shouldn't straight away repost it

I've not reposted any topic, Tommy?
I asked "Has The Southport Thread Been Removed"?

And the quotes from Ozy were not even included on the removed thread
Have you got a problem with it?

Cheshire Cat

Yes I have !!!!

And who the bloody hell is Ozy ?

"And who the bloody hell is Ozy"?

He's a traveller from an antique land ......

I have found that Ozzy, one of those numpty's who think that Australia is the land of "Plenty" as those 'Men at Work' Johnies described it, when it's not.

Chesh might be Sledge, why is she making such a fuzz, He was a troll and we are better off without him,,

cheshire cat it was on admins request that stardelta replied to his blog & got barred for it ? .

i must have hit a nerve

cheshire cat the biggest free loaders are the tory party who pay no tax & rip us off at every oppotunity .

I know, Whups.
If I go missing from this site because I have agreed with Ozy and my opinion does not fit in with admins agenda, don't be surprised. But I will 100% assure you, I won't jump. I will have been pushed!

I 100% agree with what Ozy typed below. Well done that man / woman

"I’d like to make it clear that I don’t necessarily always agree with Stardelta’s views … in fact , I find many of his posts , particularly on the topic of immigration for example , to be tediously inflexible at times , but the bloke ,
( at least I assume it’s a bloke ) , comes across to me as being both intelligent and articulate. Both virtues combined being a relatively rare combination on this site.

"But where’s the benefit from banning him from the site ? … it’s censorship … nothing less .
We constantly bleat on about censorship in North Korea and various other left wing or communist countries , yet choose to bar a bloke from speaking his mind on a bloody tinpot Wiggin social media site for Christ's sake .

…" Jesus wept ….can you see the irony here Ron ?"

"It’s blatant censorship ,
nothing more nor less ."

"I suppose this post may also be subject to censorship … time will tell ".

Regards . Ozy .

"There is no defence of entrapment in English law but it is considered to be an abuse of the process of the court for state agents to lure a person into committing illegal acts and then seek to prosecute him for doing so."

chashire did you see the southport thread admin put on here . he stated that he awaited stardelta,s reply & got barred for replying back ? .

Yes, I did, Whups.
That is what Ozy commented on from which I've quoted the above.

I’ve long been a fan of Ozymandias writing in both style and content. I’m sure he could have made a good living out of it. I first became aware of it when I discovered we were both ‘involved’ with the haulage company owned by Fred Rose of Blackrod. However, I suspect and maybe wrong, that Ozy has not followed SD’s posts in depth particularly with his barbs against Old Codger.

I suspect you are wrong, Gaffer.
I think he knows what he is talking about.
Have you not read this bit?

"I’d like to make it clear that I don’t necessarily always agree with Stardelta’s views … in fact , I find many of his posts , particularly on the topic of immigration for example , to be tediously inflexible at times , but the bloke ,
( at least I assume it’s a bloke ) , comes across to me as being both intelligent and articulate. Both virtues combined being a relatively rare combination on this site.

But where’s the benefit from banning him from the site ? … it’s censorship … nothing less ".

Sledge got banned because he's a trouble making troll, he reappeared as Stardeltla and continued his trouble shit stirring way and so got banned again, thats way he got banned and why is chesh making a thing about it?
She's not known for defending trolls so. it makes me think Chesh could be Stardelta as well. I' would not it past sledge to have another account or 2 or 3 even,

Over the years I have had dis/agreements with Stardelta and either ignored his comments or replied to his comments but would never of put him on ignore. To do this meant he had won even if he was wrong I am sure there are still worse posters on WW who under various names have got away with a lot over the years.

he got banned by admin for replying to admins post on southport & at admins request .

That is correct, Whups.

Posted by: PeterP (11521)
"Over the years I have had dis/agreements with Stardelta and either ignored his comments or replied to his comments but would never of put him on ignore. To do this meant he had won"

You are a proper man, Peter. And have a big heart, strong backbone and a solid spine.

It's a crying shame that a couple of other male members on here can't follow your example. Instead they adopt the cognitive ostrich effect as opposed dealing with the given situation.

The more you post , the more I'm convinced that you are another account of, Sledge/Sardelta/Bernard and his other usernames, you hide behind a monitor with no name or detail of where abouts and collect evidence to counter attack others, the same M.O as Sledge. So from this moment on you shall be housed in Sledge's cell in the ignore prison because I know how much you will hate not being read,

Good night.

Tom

Errrrrrrmm

This Bernard chap, who was he ?

another of sledges accounts, I don't keep index's of the postings and comments like they do and can't be arsed going back and re posting them, he also posted in his wifes name one time and forgot to log out so. he gave himself away, he has nothing else to do all day but post on forums,
The tell tale signs are,
never a proper name or area where he lives, no photos, no details , no past history just , no one will know him and no references other than fake or made up diplomas
that is a troll,

Tom

So was this Bernard chap on here

yes,

Posted by: tomplum (13026) View tomplum's page
The more you post , the more I'm convinced that you are another account of, Sledge/Sardelta/Bernard

The only Bernard I found was Bernard Coyle a Wigan Rugby player.
As far as I can see only ever posted on Album.

Link

I would think he would now be in his mid 70s

From Kier Starmer
What will you do to combat misinformation?
published at 16:29
16:29
The prime minister is now taking a question from a reporter from the Times, who asks what he'll do to combat misinformation online.

The reporter also asks if he has a message for Nigel Farage, who shared a video earlier this week asking questions about the Southport attacker.

Starmer says inciting violence online is a criminal offence and "is not a matter of free speech", adding that platform providers must strike a balance.

On Farage, Starmer doesn't mention him directly but says he "won't cast judgement on what others say", adding that his focus is on the victims and their families in Southport.
BBC Live reporting

yes the clackton cuckoo is always ready to point the finger even when he,s wrong . he doesnt have an british sounding name does he /

Hello, its midnight drinking time again!

maybe you shud pack in drinking & answer a few questions .

The twitchers will be out in force today looking for this hitherto unknown bird the clackton cuckoo. Perhaps the MP for Clacton will join in the hunt.

Whups

Only ever drink when out for a meal at a pub or restaurant.

No fours packs and burning the midnight oil for me!