Login   |   Register   |   

It Would Seem

Started by: Joseph77 (inactive)

That my re-joining WW is upsetting some people. So far most of my threads have been filled with snide remarks, on the majority of my posts yet more comments, apparently I have a gang. It's no fun being trolled every time I log into WW, this I lay the blame fully at the feet of Basil Brush. If need be I shall bring up every thread and post he/she/they have trolled me on to prove so. Basil Brush has done the same to others and myself over the years, he/she/they never stop, I have ignored the trolling since returning but it's constant, the latest instalment aimed at me is this.

Posted by: basil brush (6980)5,000+ Report abuse

Does he not no this is Wigan no1 forum.

I hate, bullies, people who follow each other around in a pack, think they own this site and think there above people and everything revolves around them

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 11:57

He/she/they suggests I am a bully, I think I own the WW site and I'm above other people. From the first day of my posting this has been the case.

Started: 26th Sep 2016 at 12:40

Posted by: basil brush (19583)

Can seem to see your name mentioned, it's something I've said long before you came back to the site you called a "human zoo" so please stop trying to cause trouble, it's been smashing on here lately so don't spoil it

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 12:43

Posted by: fingers (inactive)

Continue as you have been by ignoring trolls.
Seem the peevish trolls are becoming annoyed by it. Carry on winning, Carry on ignoring.

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 12:45

Posted by: Tommy Two Stroke (15382)

Joseph

Well why don't you bugger off then

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 12:49

Posted by: Joseph77 (inactive)

Hardly worth posting anything due to the trolling, Fingers.

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 12:50

Posted by: momac (12435) 

Joseph,you've been like a ray of sunshine..ignore the troll..we all know
who he is,it hasn't got through to him that people are ignoring him..
ignorance must truly be bliss..

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 12:51

Posted by: fingers (inactive)

What, and allow this site to sink back into the mire?
Am sure Joseph will get much support from the decent posters.

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 12:51

Posted by: Anne (4386) 

CARRY ON REGARDLESS, Joseph.

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 12:57

Posted by: broady (inactive)

I think all of us who post have detractors. If I were to get someone whose views I respected constantly disagreeing with my posts it would at some point cause me to look at what I am posting but if they were insignificant, non opinionated posters it wouldn't concern me one iota. Carry on posting. Hopefully Management will root out the non contributors at some time but I wouldn't hold my breath.

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 13:00

Posted by: peter g (3529) 

Welcome back Joseph Sod em

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 13:22

Posted by: basil brush (19583)

Tommy, hahaha

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 13:23

Posted by: lisalee (12155) 

In the words of Taylor Swift "the hater's gonna hate hate hate hate hate"

Ignore the troll Joseph. He's not worth a rise!

Remove the audience and you effectively remove the troll!

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 13:28

Posted by: Joseph77 (inactive)

I suppose it may be because I posted quite prolifically when I came back. One or two who had not bothered posting for some time seemed to think it was some kind of competition and suddenly sprang into life, a tad childish but there you go. I'm not here for anyone's approval, I don't need or crave it as some do.

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 13:32

Posted by: erontquay (inactive)

I for one enjoy your posts Joseph, here and over the fence on Wigan Rejects.

Yes Anne

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 13:45

Posted by: jouell (4705)

I don't post much at all, never did, but I have posted more since you came back Joseph.. I enjoy your humour and your light hearted posts... I really hope you stay, but I do understand if you do leave.... Such a shame the 'few' spoil it for the rest....

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 14:00

Posted by: basil brush (19583)

Talk about flattering yourself.

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 14:05

Posted by: dodger (3414)

Joseph, you continue posting.
It is time the admin did something about the resident troll, who tries to start yet another argument with every post he makes.
If the members just ignore him he will soon get sick of talking to himself.

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 14:09

Posted by: momac (12435) 

Joseph,if you leave they've won..I echo jouells comments..please just put the no brainers on ignore.

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 14:14

Posted by: Joseph77 (inactive)

Started by: brian (838)500+ View blog Report abuse
Don't forget the basic rules you all agreed to when signing up to use the boards:

* Do not attack or provoke others.

* Do not use foul or abusive language.

* Do not post racist, sexually explicit or other objectionable material.

* No trade or commercial links / sales.

* Do not impersonate someone else.

* Do not 'Spam' the messageboards.

* Do not link to obscene sites / images.

* No politics on the message boards

* You are responsible for what you post.

Please take particular notice of the last point - wiganworld is merely a venue - you are responsible for what you post.

Started: 16th Aug 2008 at 16:16
Last edited by admin: 9th May 2014 at 22:10:47

Could admin tell me the consequences of breaking these rules set out by Brian. I refer mostly to the "Do not attack or provoke others" rule. Thanks.

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 14:15

Posted by: basil brush (19583)

Where as names been actually mentioned?

I find it ironic that the people who use to go around in a pack attacking decent posters and coming out with personal comments have turned the tables and accused someone of ruining the site........ Unbelievable!!!!!!!!!

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 14:33

Posted by: fingers (inactive)

Seems you have the backing of the entire WW community so far, Joseph. A poll would have you at 99.99%

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 14:34

Posted by: gaffer (7959) 

Joseph

Carry on the good work regardless. It's easier to snipe from the terrace than to play on the field.

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 14:37

Posted by: fingers (inactive)

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 14:38

Posted by: basil brush (19583)

People might thinks he's attention seeking by making more of it. After all a person has only posted about the type of people he doesn't like, which he is entitled to do.

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 14:42

Posted by: lisalee (12155) 

Great post gaffer!

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 14:50

Posted by: Jazzy (8656) 

Joseph, I believe there should room for every opinion, however, you trolled the guestbook did you not, when you were between WW memberships?

And then there was this unlovely comment regarding WW members, I am referring to the last two sentences.


Posted by: erontquay (13411)10,000+ View blog Report abuse

A message from Joseph


To all who are looking in from WW, no matter what Paul is suggesting about the Aadil Khan post on the Guestbook I can assure you the post was created by me 'Joseph' and no one else. It is impossible for it to have been printed/typed anywhere else before the 18th July 2015 as I had only typed it out on the Guestbook that very day. So I suggest that 'Paul' is an untrustworthy liar of the highest order, but he knows that and the truth of the matter. He would need to get up very early to get one over on me. I swear by all that I hold dear to me that that I am telling the truth and may I loose it all if I am lying.

I will not be made out to be a liar by someone who uses the plight of homeless soldiers or any other forces personnel to belittle others of a different race, religion or colour. I care not one jot what any of the WW members think of me, whether it be a troll or anything else, I regard the majority of the members lesser than something I may have trod in on the street. Lack of moral fibre afflicts most on WW.

Replied: 25th Sep 2015 at 18:22



You trolled Paul from the guest book because you did not agree with his opinion, you impersonated someone else in the Aadil comment, and admitted that you did. Does it not count since you weren't a member at that time? Even though your post was deliberately directed at a member?

You have no higher moral ground in regards trolling.

I can't say I agree with all of the posts that Baz makes, because I don't, but he's just as entitled to his opinion about you as you believed you were entitled to an opinion about Paul.

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 15:32

Posted by: Joseph77 (inactive)

I did not troll Paul at all I just made folk aware that he was a liar. He stated that he had seen the Aadil post on various other sites around the country. That is not trolling. I knew it was him as I took note of his IP but rather than out him myself I let others figure it out, which they soon did. Thanks for your concern.

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 15:47
Last edited by Joseph77: 26th Sep 2016 at 15:55:39

Posted by: Joseph77 (inactive)

Oh and by the way it was other unknown persons who posted pretending to be me.

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 15:51

Posted by: Joseph77 (inactive)

"I care not one jot what any of the WW members think of me, whether it be a troll or anything else, I regard the majority of the members lesser than something I may have trod in on the street. Lack of moral fibre afflicts most on WW."

I still stand by this, and the true decent members who I communicate with on here know the ones I mean.

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 16:01

Posted by: fingers (inactive)

Well put, Joseph.

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 16:02

Posted by: Jazzy (8656) 

Joseph, I agree with the comment in your OP, it's no fun being trolled.

You did troll Paul in the original post on the guest book. It was specifically posted for that purpose. You created the Aadil post and owned up to doing so. That was impersonating someone else was it not? It's still there, everything can be checked if people choose to do so.

Eront posted the IP address that the re-posts were from, it was ME that directly called Paul out about the fact that he was responsible for the re-posts. And Paul finally admitted responsibility for the re-posts.

At that time, I also suggested you should rejoin WW and debate your different opinions openly, because I find trolling childish. All this is easy enough to check, it's all still there.

You may have thought you had a genuine reason to troll Paul because you disagreed with his opinion,

BUT

I care not one jot what any of the WW members think of me, whether it be a troll or anything else, I regard the majority of the members lesser than something I may have trod in on the street. Lack of moral fibre afflicts most on WW.

Really ?

Everyone member is entitled to their opinion, including Baz and even those under your shoe.

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 16:07
Last edited by Jazzy: 26th Sep 2016 at 16:10:05

Posted by: Joseph77 (inactive)

People must think I have no idea of what I have said/typed on WW by bringing things up, do they think it worries me or do they believe they have got one over on me, I don't care. People know what type of person I am, they can take from that what they wish. I don't need others approval.

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 16:12

Posted by: Tommy Two Stroke (15382)

Joseph

I was only joking so don't bugger off

Jarvo

I wish yoo would bugger off

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 16:43

Posted by: fingers (inactive)

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 16:46

Posted by: broady (inactive)

Someone who has been banned from here three or four times should not even be a member never mind posting the same, repetitive bilge day after day.

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 16:58

Posted by: gemfree (inactive)

some people will never be good enough to walk in your shoes Joseph...stay and enjoy...

It's been tons better since you came back...

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 17:10

Posted by: fingers (inactive)

First rule of WW club

*Do not attack or provoke others.

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 17:32

Posted by: basil brush (19583)

Great posts jazzy

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 17:47

Posted by: lectriclegs (5712)

And have you noticed how he clings to people who show the least bit of support?

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 17:52

Posted by: lapis lazuli (inactive)

Because he's a Klingon.

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 17:54

Posted by: fletcher (694) 

Joseph, I think you are a fab poster and a gentleman to boot. Please continue to post as you really make me laugh

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 17:57

Posted by: fingers (inactive)

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 18:02

Posted by: basil brush (19583)

Posted by: fingers (449) [100+] Report abuse

First rule of WW club

*Do not attack or provoke others.

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 17:32

so how come you never said out about this

Posted by: lapis lazuli (2736) [2,500+] Report abuse

Wish we'd kick out the thieving pikeys while we're at it.

Replied: 17th Oct 2015 at 12:10

osted by: lapis lazuli (2777) [2,500+] Report abuse

No, I'm saying you can't take feather off a frog, numbnuts.

Here's some proof for you, I don't doubt you'll be brown nosing to have it removed, like the last lot.


osted by: lapis lazuli (3045) Report abuse

Billy bullshine, the tax dodging swine!

Replied: 22nd Nov 2015 at 11:17


Posted by: lapis lazuli (3116) Report abuse

Didn't I already say that, numbnuts?

Replied: 29th Nov 2015 at 13:38




Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 18:23

Posted by: erontquay (inactive)

I had to google numbnuts

numbnuts
A person of severely limited intellectual prowess.

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 18:45

Posted by: lapis lazuli (inactive)

(Comment removed because it broke the rules)

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 18:46

Posted by: basil brush (19583)

Rules are though for everyone.

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 18:49

Posted by: broady (inactive)

Why have you been banned from here on numerous occasions in the past??

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 18:54

Posted by: dodger (3414)

Posted by: Jazzy (8506) Report abuse

Everyone member is entitled to their opinion,


Yes, but they haven't been thrusting the same opinion at us on almost every post they have made over the last six years.

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 19:02
Last edited by dodger: 26th Sep 2016 at 19:06:00

Posted by: gemfree (inactive)

Dodger

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 19:14

Posted by: basil brush (19583)

Thanks jazzy for bringing that to everyone's attention.

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 19:20

Posted by: lectriclegs (5712)

Thanks,Broady for bringing that to everyone's attention

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 19:25

Posted by: basil brush (19583)

I believe there's others but I'm not on here to cause trouble

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 19:48

Posted by: fingers (inactive)

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 19:52
Last edited by fingers: 26th Sep 2016 at 19:52:59

Posted by: irene (2901) 

I stopped going on here for a very long time because I was sick of the childish bickering. Since returning a week or so ago, things seemed to have improved and I have really enjoyed joining in with some interesting posts. However, I have been puzzled by contributions constantly harking back to "abuse" when there has been no abuse whatsoever on the posts in question. Why bring something up that has nothing to do with a post? It's as if the person is trying to provoke a reaction.....Why??

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 19:52

Posted by: lectriclegs (5712)

Here Irene have a tiddley

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 19:55

Posted by: irene (2901) 

Thanks, lecticlegs.....fantastic! (But I'd rather have a Barley Wine!). x.

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 19:59

Posted by: Joseph77 (inactive)

Simple answer, Our Irene, some folk took offence at me returning to WW so they went out of their way to spoil every post I made.

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 19:59

Posted by: fingers (inactive)

99.95% of the site agree.

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 20:02

Posted by: GOLDEN BEAR (6556) 

Well that has been an interesting read i must say but not being on here for long i am in the dark somewhat, but on what i have read the "joseph guy " sounds and admits his involvement and then there is Jazzy's thread which appears to know the full story as i say i don't know joseph but i think an apology would go along way.
Also i personally do not like being referred to as something under one's shoe , having said all that when i joined this site i stupidly thought that it was a coming together of Wiganer's and other's to talk chat exchange views and opinions with one another i am wondering if it's worth all this nastiness . HOPE YOU ALL HAVE A NICE DAY!

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 20:06

Posted by: basil brush (19583)

Also i personally do not like being referred to as something under one's shoe

None of us do, gb, but it's there for everyone to see

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 20:10

Posted by: Joseph77 (inactive)

That's just tough, suck it up.

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 20:13

Posted by: broady (inactive)

GB,
What you read today is only a snippet. Basil Brush as he is currently known as has been banned three or four times and returns under different names. In his latest guise he has managed to control the nastiness for which he was always being banned. However as other people have said he contributes zilch and posts the same repetitive bilge day after day " good posters like me" "the gang are in town" etc. From my experience with him he is an out and out liar. When he returned as Basil Brush I asked him outright if he had been on here previously and he replied NO. Anyone with a modicum of intelligence could see that it was him.

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 20:17

Posted by: fingers (inactive)

“If you never see a fool
You'll always be happy.

The one who keeps company with fools
Will be sorry for a long time.
It's painful to live with fools,
Like being always with an enemy.”

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 20:21

Posted by: basil brush (19583)

It's better to let "some people" think they are right all the time, that way they won't get nasty.

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 20:22

Posted by: broady (inactive)

Oops, I forgot another of his familiar daily phrases "some people"

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 20:24

Posted by: fingers (inactive)

Can we get back to pretending it doesn't exist and enjoy the site now, please?

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 20:24

Posted by: Joseph77 (inactive)

I also have my suspicions on who posted on the guestbook pretending or making others think it was me.

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 20:25

Posted by: lectriclegs (5712)

And to add to Broady's post, GB. there is more than one person posting on that account.

Notice the difference in spelling and punctuation.

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 20:26

Posted by: broady (inactive)

fingers,
I am with you. A lovely day outside and I am sat here when I could be mowing the lawn.

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 20:27

Posted by: fingers (inactive)

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 20:29

Posted by: dodger (3414)

Good advice from Fingers.

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 20:30

Posted by: Joseph77 (inactive)

I'd do mine only it's pitch black now and wet.

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 20:31

Posted by: lapis lazuli (inactive)

I've got a torch you can borrow.

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 20:44

Posted by: fingers (inactive)

Do you have a pitchfork and a bunch of angry villagers as well?

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 20:49

Posted by: grimshaw (3998) 

joseph.

lifes to short .

embrace and move on

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 20:53

Posted by: lapis lazuli (inactive)

I've a bunch of grapes and a dessert fork, will that do?

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 20:56

Posted by: gemfree (inactive)

Posted by: Joseph77 (897) Report abuse

I'd do mine only it's pitch black now and wet.

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 20:31

and you can't hang the washing put either

Replied: 26th Sep 2016 at 21:06

Posted by: graneyjoseph (4618) 

welcome back Jazzy.

Replied: 27th Sep 2016 at 05:27

Posted by: basil brush (19583)

Yes, nice to see another decent poster back on.

Replied: 27th Sep 2016 at 08:46

Posted by: Joseph77 (inactive)

Seems like the plague of WW gets away with the same old crap yet again.

Replied: 27th Sep 2016 at 09:18

Posted by: basil brush (19583)

I just wish more of the decent posters would come back on

Replied: 27th Sep 2016 at 09:59

Posted by: Joseph77 (inactive)

See me, I'm back.

Replied: 27th Sep 2016 at 10:21

Posted by: basil brush (19583)

I miss wizzerwin to. Another decent poster.

Replied: 27th Sep 2016 at 10:28

Posted by: Joseph77 (inactive)

I miss the real decent posters like Dustaf, Mac, Nicola et al. The ones who really contributed and were well liked.

Won't be long now then there will a real step forward for WW. I've started the ball rolling by getting the boards out of the mire it was stuck in for years.

Replied: 27th Sep 2016 at 10:56
Last edited by Joseph77: 27th Sep 2016 at 10:59:31

Posted by: i-spy (15252) 

You could join my modesty club Joseph

Replied: 27th Sep 2016 at 15:54

Posted by: basil brush (19583)

Is that the boards you called a "human zoo"?????????

Replied: 27th Sep 2016 at 16:38

Posted by: broady (inactive)

Or is it the boards you have been banned from three or four times??

Replied: 27th Sep 2016 at 16:49

Posted by: dodger (3414)

Broady, just ignore his negative comments, like everyone else is doing,, don't give him the satisfaction of another argument.

Replied: 27th Sep 2016 at 17:04

Posted by: broady (inactive)

Replied: 27th Sep 2016 at 17:18

Posted by: Joseph77 (inactive)

"You could join my modesty club Joseph"

They won't have me.

Replied: 27th Sep 2016 at 17:41

Posted by: basil brush (19583)

Negative comments, I was just asking a simple question, we'll I thought it simple enough.

Replied: 27th Sep 2016 at 18:17

Posted by: Joseph77 (inactive)

Well despite the negativity of the bad uns I have been made most welcome by the decent folk of WW. I thank each and every one of you for the kind remarks and warmth you have shown towards me.

Replied: 27th Sep 2016 at 19:16

Posted by: basil brush (19583)

I don't think I'll ask about the other comments then.

Replied: 27th Sep 2016 at 20:21
Last edited by basil brush: 27th Sep 2016 at 20:42:54

Posted by: lapis lazuli (inactive)

Because you're doing it to stir trouble?

Replied: 27th Sep 2016 at 22:44

Posted by: basil brush (19583)

What's Terry on about now, I'm not asking about the other comments because he seems to be struggling to answer a very simple question.

How's becoming a solicitor going?

Replied: 28th Sep 2016 at 08:39

Posted by: erontquay (inactive)

What would WW be without you Joseph

Replied: 28th Sep 2016 at 09:36

Posted by: Joseph77 (inactive)

I enjoy it, Eront.

It's nice having the choice of who I respond to on WW, some will try to make you respond using childish remarks, it does't work with me. I find it polite to address people by using their name, just good manners really.

Replied: 28th Sep 2016 at 10:01

Posted by: basil brush (19583)

It would be like it was before..... Smashing

Replied: 28th Sep 2016 at 10:04

Posted by: britboy (6794)

The usual he said she said...to bad it's it's going out to the world at large!

Replied: 28th Sep 2016 at 13:45
Last edited by britboy: 28th Sep 2016 at 13:46:30

Posted by: britboy (6794)

VISITOR....Oh! Let's have a look in on Wigan World before we visit, maybe we can have a chat with the locals to get a feel for the place....hell! Look at some of the comments on here, maybe we should steer clear of the place!

Replied: 28th Sep 2016 at 13:57

Posted by: broady (inactive)

Or they could check who has had an eye test this week by a nubile young lady. Riveting. They'll draw their own conclusions.

Replied: 28th Sep 2016 at 14:26

Posted by: britboy (6794)

And that's my point exactly...the trolls carry on trawling up comments

Replied: 28th Sep 2016 at 14:40

Posted by: broady (inactive)

Check out the JUST thread and pretend you are a visitor. 12 out of 14 comments by the same person. Riveting stuff. The visitor will decide.

Replied: 28th Sep 2016 at 14:56

Posted by: britboy (6794)


Started by: britboy (5969)5,000+ Report abuse
Again! My eye check every 6 months, passed with flying colours, not my usual doc , a nubile young lady....very nice...had a good laugh...I think I'll change Doctor

I wouldn't class this as character assassination comment as is often seen on WW.

Replied: 28th Sep 2016 at 15:16

Posted by: broady (inactive)

No compulsion to read it. I wouldn't class an eye check as remotely interesting. But, hey, we all have opinions.

Replied: 28th Sep 2016 at 15:18

Posted by: britboy (6794)

And that is it again... I have my opinions and respect others but stepping outside the bounds of common decency is something else altogether.

Replied: 28th Sep 2016 at 15:21

Posted by: broady (inactive)

Who decides what is "common decency" We both do as they are what we want them to be.

Replied: 28th Sep 2016 at 15:27

Posted by: britboy (6794)

Common decency and personal integrity I'm sure are things to strive for, there may be many distractions and distractors along the way but in my opinion they are goals worth working towards.

Short of appearing to be preaching to the great unwashed, opinions are varied and vast and need to be respected.

Replied: 28th Sep 2016 at 16:12

Posted by: Joseph77 (inactive)

Don't read them, ignore if they are of no importance. I don't comment on yours for that very reason.

Replied: 28th Sep 2016 at 16:28

Posted by: britboy (6794)

Personal choice Joseph, personal choice that I can respect

Replied: 28th Sep 2016 at 16:31

Posted by: britboy (6794)

I need to re-examine my personal 10 year attachment to WW.

Replied: 28th Sep 2016 at 16:33

Posted by: Joseph77 (inactive)

I agree. Some things suit others don't, we all can't be the same, and who wish to be.

Replied: 28th Sep 2016 at 16:38

Posted by: britboy (6794)

1984...fiction becoming fact

Replied: 28th Sep 2016 at 17:35

Posted by: i-spy (15252) 

Don't worry britboy. I enjoy your posts. And that's all that matters

Replied: 28th Sep 2016 at 17:51

Posted by: lapis lazuli (inactive)

Is Woy still jabbering on?

Replied: 28th Sep 2016 at 18:05

Posted by: britboy (6794)

11777) View i-spy's page10,000+ Report abuse

Don't worry britboy. I enjoy your posts. And that's all that matters

Replied: 28th Sep 2016 at 17:51

Another troll stiring the shit

I'm being persecuted !!

Replied: 28th Sep 2016 at 18:11
Last edited by britboy: 28th Sep 2016 at 18:12:44

Posted by: britboy (6794)

^^^^^^ damn drama queen!

Replied: 28th Sep 2016 at 18:17
Last edited by britboy: 28th Sep 2016 at 18:18:13

Posted by: copperhead (1415) 

Don't go Joseph ignore the trolls.

Replied: 30th Sep 2016 at 15:36

Posted by: nanajacqui (4342) 

Well I think Joseph is a top poster & will be annoyed if he's forced out...

Replied: 4th Oct 2016 at 11:54

Posted by: Joseph77 (inactive)

I won't be forced out, Nana. I'm far too righteous and decent.

Replied: 4th Oct 2016 at 19:06

Posted by: stars (432) 

nanajacqui he can't be forced out surely, after all the shinnanagins what's been going on,Joseph77 has calmed the silly storm

Replied: 4th Oct 2016 at 19:49

Posted by: Joseph77 (inactive)

I take it all with a pinch of salt, Stars, even the personal bits. I don't let things or anyone worry me, it's all just internet nonsense after all.

Replied: 4th Oct 2016 at 20:05

Posted by: basil brush (19583)

Personal bits

Replied: 5th Oct 2016 at 10:51

Posted by: momac (12435) 

I don't think Joseph could be forced to do anything..

Replied: 5th Oct 2016 at 11:47

Posted by: britboy (6794)

There's WW members just throw out a baited line to see what they can catch.

Replied: 5th Oct 2016 at 13:34

Posted by: Joseph77 (inactive)

Replied: 5th Oct 2016 at 14:01

Posted by: basil brush (19583)

And members who think they own the site and are above everyone else.

Replied: 5th Oct 2016 at 14:11

Posted by: Joseph77 (inactive)

Tart!

Replied: 5th Oct 2016 at 14:12

Posted by: britboy (6794)

Lol....Tart... Just reminded me of something I overheard. As a senior engineer in a big company, I once overheard some juniors making reference to me lolol...." Oh! You are not working with THE BITCH today are you??" I nearly wet my draws laughing . I think it was something to do with forcing them to think for themselves

I believe if you can laugh at any derogatory remark you are on the best side of it.

Replied: 5th Oct 2016 at 14:42
Last edited by britboy: 5th Oct 2016 at 14:49:23

Posted by: Joseph77 (inactive)

You've got to laugh.

Replied: 5th Oct 2016 at 15:02

Posted by: lapis lazuli (inactive)

If you can't laugh, you'd cry.

Some people look like they've been sucking on a lemon.

Replied: 5th Oct 2016 at 15:09

Posted by: britboy (6794)

Some people

Replied: 5th Oct 2016 at 19:58

 

Note: You must login to use this feature.

If you haven't registered, why not join now?. Registration is free.