Login   |   Register   |   

robot vaccum cleaners

Started by: whups (13212) 

has anyone got or had 1 of these robot vaccums or know anyone who,s had 1 . is there any good 1s or any that shud be avoided . price will be a factor & i,d like your opinions on them ? .

Started: 23rd Apr 2021 at 12:05

Posted by: laughing gravy (inactive)

AND THERE YOU HAVE IT! WORKSHYS TOO BONE IDLE AND LAZY TO PUSH A VACUUM ABOUT.....
LAZIER THAN COLUMBO'S EYE HE IS..

Replied: 23rd Apr 2021 at 12:39
Last edited by laughing gravy: 23rd Apr 2021 at 12:43:51

Posted by: Don GB (662)

"LAZIER THAN COLUMBO'S EYE"

Replied: 23rd Apr 2021 at 12:56

Posted by: momac (12425) 

Aww ..That's not fair,he might be disabled in some way.

Replied: 23rd Apr 2021 at 13:26

Posted by: laughing gravy (inactive)

oh he's disabled oreet, he's lacking a brain!...

Replied: 23rd Apr 2021 at 14:25

Posted by: momac (12425) 

That's not very nice now is it.

Replied: 23rd Apr 2021 at 14:31

Posted by: momac (12425) 

That's not very nice now is it.

Replied: 23rd Apr 2021 at 14:31

Posted by: whups (13212) 

i expect it from these 2 scumbags momac especially when laughing boy threatened to give a "good kicking" to a chap with stage 4 cancer & dance on his grave when he died & his so-called mate don gb who was at 1 time 0yrs backing him up . these are the type of trolls that shud be banned from sites like this .

Replied: 23rd Apr 2021 at 15:37

Posted by: laughing gravy (inactive)

you've already told momac once workshy... you repeat yourself that much you cant remember.. NOBODYS INTERESTED and if they are i dont give a damn...

robotic vacuums... thats the best one yet.....BWAHAHAHAHAHA

Replied: 23rd Apr 2021 at 16:47

Posted by: whups (13212) 

robot arseholes = you & 0yrs.

Replied: 23rd Apr 2021 at 16:48

Posted by: momac (12425) 

Aren't they brave behind a screen.

Replied: 23rd Apr 2021 at 17:18

Posted by: laughing gravy (inactive)

momac go on sports whups wants me and Don to die thats the sort of SCUMBAG you sticking up for!.......

Replied: 23rd Apr 2021 at 18:15

Posted by: Don GB (662)

"his so-called mate don gb who was at 1 time 0yrs backing him up"

At NO TIME did I back up LG with regards to his reference to Fireplace. This is made up nonsense. In fact, if you trawl through my historical posts you will see that I did not condone his verbal treatment of FP at any point in the slightest, quite the opposite.

For the record FP was a great bloke who I had the pleasure of meeting and I regarded, and still regard, LG's comments as unacceptable.

DO NOT accuse me of untruths just to score personal points against LG.

Momac, do not believe his erratic rants. LG and whups have a continuing feud of which I am not part, however whups continues to attempt to drag me into it.

Replied: 23rd Apr 2021 at 19:22
Last edited by Don GB : 23rd Apr 2021 at 19:25:15

Posted by: momac (12425) 

Okay.

Replied: 23rd Apr 2021 at 19:33

Posted by: Don GB (662)

Sorry Momac, I hope you didn't think the post was to you, only the last sentence was directed to your goodself.

The rest of it was to whups, who I hope will calm down a touch, in fact both of them could do with doing.

Hopefully, he and LG will call a truce.

Replied: 23rd Apr 2021 at 19:40
Last edited by Don GB : 23rd Apr 2021 at 19:40:43

Posted by: whups (13212) 

wot a liar you are both of you . dongb met with fireplace then after that you back up scumbag with every post he puts on . his post about fireplace he never denies he said wot he said & is on open record . plus he got banned when he was kellys dad for racial abuse . thats the kind of scum he is . momac just look at who starts the hatred among people on that sports blog & all we do is respond in kind .also momac take a look at the blog HE put on called "chatty you win i,m outta here " then you,ll see for yourself wot a liar he is .

Replied: 23rd Apr 2021 at 20:07
Last edited by whups: 23rd Apr 2021 at 20:11:02

Posted by: Don GB (662)

whups, you are making things up again.

Post proof now that I have backed up LG with regards to his alleged threat to FP.

Or shut up about it!

Do not drag me into your petty squabbles with LG and stop trying to drag Momac into it.

And you wonder why I always have you on ignore!

Replied: 23rd Apr 2021 at 20:14
Last edited by Don GB : 23rd Apr 2021 at 20:17:52

Posted by: Pewfall (529) 

Amazing what robots can do these days.

Robots today

Replied: 23rd Apr 2021 at 20:21

Posted by: laughing gravy (inactive)

what rascist post did i get banned for workshy post it so momac can see i dare you lets see whos the LIAR...

Replied: 23rd Apr 2021 at 20:24

Posted by: Don GB (662)

I will do your work for you whups

Below is a past conversation between myself and whups.

WHUPS Replied: 17th Jul 2020 at 11:29
"LG" (sic) wanting to give a cancer victim a "good kicking" then threatening to dance on his grave when he died . get it right 0years . did,nt you meet fireplace in wigan once ?

WHUPS Replied: 17th Jul 2020 at 11:58
downright disgusting.

0 YEARS Replied: 17th Jul 2020 at 12:04
I can't disagree with you whups, that was out of order.

Does that sound like I was backing up LG?

Stop making things up whups!

Replied: 23rd Apr 2021 at 20:40
Last edited by Don GB : 23rd Apr 2021 at 20:53:17

Posted by: momac (12425) 

I'm really not bothered about look at this and look at that,I just don't like it when people are at loggerheads,there's been people on this forum that have been as I say at loggerheads and they aren't around any more..can't you all just call it a day, and drop all the terrible comments, life's too short believe me...and you'll sleep better.

Replied: 23rd Apr 2021 at 20:40

Posted by: Don GB (662)

You are exactly right momac, a voice of reason.

I completely agree, and for that very reason I had whups on ignore for a long time.......that is, until I read today that he apparently wanted me dead. As a result I looked at his post to see whether this was true.....it wasn't.

He is now back on ignore and he and LG can bicker to their hearts' content. Without me being dragged into it.

Replied: 23rd Apr 2021 at 20:50
Last edited by Don GB : 23rd Apr 2021 at 20:51:51

Posted by: whups (13212) 

it,s you 2 scumbags that start it . all anyone needs to do is to look at your posts on the sports section . this blog is another . show me the proof that i ever said that vaccum cleaner was for me ? . then 0yrs or don gb take a look at your reply ? .

Replied: 24th Apr 2021 at 00:02

Posted by: PeterP (11291)

There is a thread about LACK OF ACTIVITY on these boards when this thread is a good example of WHY members do not post I have had my differences with Whups but he asked a question and from the outset he was slagged off . If no-one can answer the question raised then this thread should be PICKFORDed

Replied: 24th Apr 2021 at 08:17

Posted by: peter israel (2120) 

has anyone got or had 1 of these robot vaccums ? most of my friend have! I was going to get one but i have a dog and you set the robot to when your not home and it travels around the house using infra red so not very dog friendly also not good on dog hair or carpet but if you have a tile or wood floor go for it

Replied: 24th Apr 2021 at 08:33

Posted by: berylh (2168)

Here we go again - children in the playground behave better

Replied: 24th Apr 2021 at 10:56

Posted by: whups (13212) 

thanx for that peter for a sensible answer . berylh it,s the same 2 that,s always the same . especialy laughing boy & it,s like talking to a 3 yr old.

Replied: 24th Apr 2021 at 11:42

Posted by: Don GB (662)

berylh
Correct.

whups,
My comment was because I thought his turn of phrase was very funny, not because it was about you. Had he said it about me it would still have been funny.

Now I am about to revert you to ignore, you might want to put LG on ignore yourself, for your own peace of mind. It can't be pleasant being so angry all the time. If you can't read him then nothing he posts about you matters.

Oh, and please don't call me a scumbag it's not nice.

BTW, I've never seen the point of those vacuums, I would think the bag is very small and it can't get into the nooks and crannies.

Replied: 24th Apr 2021 at 19:18
Last edited by Don GB : 24th Apr 2021 at 20:45:54

Posted by: whups (13212) 

that,s wot you are by being associated with laughing boy your guilty by association . you say your not involved in this feud with me & laughing boy but take a look at your reply as it,s the same as his . why did you bother to reply if it was,nt constructive like you want people to think thats wot you are ? . intelligent (not)

Replied: 24th Apr 2021 at 20:23

Posted by: Don GB (662)

It was constructive, I acknowledged his humorous turn of phrase. That is a positive affirmation (of sorts ).

You need to loosen up a bit whups, you carry too much anger.

And you are so insulting too, which isn't nice. That aside, I'm sure you are really a nice person behind the angst.

I wish you nothing but good fortune.

Replied: 24th Apr 2021 at 20:34
Last edited by Don GB : 24th Apr 2021 at 20:42:53

Posted by: whups (13212) 

humourous turn of phrase . he makes me insulting & you,ve seen his vile rants to good effect . i,m sorry but after wot he said about fireplace i,m never going to let that go .

Replied: 24th Apr 2021 at 23:59

Posted by: laughing gravy (inactive)

(Comment removed because it broke the rules)

Replied: 25th Apr 2021 at 18:05

Posted by: whups (13212) 

yet another broken rule & still not barred again . how much proof do people need about this idiot ? .

Replied: 25th Apr 2021 at 23:50

Posted by: jathbee (11463)

The comments he made were disgusting.

Replied: 26th Apr 2021 at 18:13

Posted by: whups (13212) 

i did,nt see them jathbee but when he was on here under kellys dad he got banned for racial abuse so it doesnt suprise me wot he puts on but i cannot understand why with the vile comments he puts on how he,s not got another ban ? .

Replied: 27th Apr 2021 at 00:05

Posted by: jathbee (11463)

I'm glad you didn't see what he had written. It was the most appalling post that I have ever seen.

Replied: 27th Apr 2021 at 08:36

Posted by: First Mate (2367)

Totally agree jathbee. A disgraceful, disrespectful post. Crowing about it on Sports as well.

Replied: 27th Apr 2021 at 09:41
Last edited by First Mate: 27th Apr 2021 at 09:44:05

Posted by: whups (13212) 

i,m afraid that,s all you get from this individual . how he,s still on here after getting banned under another name is beyond me ? .

Replied: 27th Apr 2021 at 11:45

Posted by: First Mate (2367)

I hope the family of the person he was referring to didn't see what he wrote. I believe in freedom of speech, not freedom to insult and be disrespectful of a person who has passed on

Replied: 27th Apr 2021 at 12:07
Last edited by First Mate: 27th Apr 2021 at 12:17:54

Posted by: whups (13212) 

i dont think his sister saw it as she,s not on the site . i take it was fireplace he was refering to ? .

Replied: 27th Apr 2021 at 12:20

Posted by: First Mate (2367)

Yes.

Replied: 27th Apr 2021 at 12:25

Posted by: whups (13212) 

that doesnt suprise me . he,s just cant help being vindictive & vile with his comments which beggars belief that he,s still on here ? .

Replied: 27th Apr 2021 at 14:13

Posted by: jathbee (11463)

It simply beggars belief that he's been allowed to get away with it.

Replied: 27th Apr 2021 at 15:11

Posted by: whups (13212) 

have you ever seen his posts on sport jathbee ? .

Replied: 28th Apr 2021 at 11:57

Posted by: jathbee (11463)

No. I don't go on sports. And if his remarks on here are anything to go by, then I have no desire too.

Replied: 28th Apr 2021 at 12:10

Posted by: PeterP (11291)

On about vacuum cleaners Shark advertise their new cleaner with a plastic comb which cuts through tangled hair from around the brush/roller.Most hair/cotton when it gets onto the roller is in the same direction as the roller so the cutter is a waste of money Most people who need to unclog the roller cut across the roller at 90degs not round the roller

Replied: 28th Apr 2021 at 15:55

Posted by: ena malcup (4151) 

Hmm.

I have observed that it is tangled/wrapped hair that has brought about the death of floor-cleaning attachments for vacs. I suspect folk are lax at keeping them free from such fouling, and perhaps fail to notice the fall-off in effectiveness because of its gradual progressive accumulation. (The frog in hot water analogy).

I have to admit that my vacuum cleaners have had their floor cleaning attachments replaced/ renewed. So I too am, it would seem, subject to this laxity.

The real question is whether the said device actually prevent this from occurring: an empirical question, only likely to be answered by testing it out.

It could be a gimmick, after all, 'Which' recently released a report claiming that 'Washing Machines DO NOT live longer with Calgon', so manufacturers claims need to be taken with a pinch of salt or two (Thousands) They long ago sussed that they do not need to have furnished a solution to a need, but just have us believe that they have done so, in order to fleece us of our dosh.

Replied: 28th Apr 2021 at 16:44
Last edited by ena malcup: 28th Apr 2021 at 16:56:32

Posted by: Fenny (2)

I have 2 Roombas remote vacuums and they're brilliant. Vacuum every day now and the carpets have never looked better. Replacement filters etc. are really cheap on Amazon too.

Replied: 29th Apr 2021 at 23:10

Posted by: jathbee (11463)

I agree with what you say ena.
I check regularly for anything that may have wrapped around the brushes.
Cotton is one of my worst offenders, as I do quite a bit of sewing.

Replied: 30th Apr 2021 at 09:21

 

Note: You must login to use this feature.

If you haven't registered, why not join now?. Registration is free.