Login   |   Register   |   

General   (General discussion, talk about anything.)

Started by: wigandiver (301)

"your post that he appealled and it was dismissed was factually wrong"
Please get it right. I never wrote that. At his second trial, he was again found guilty.

His appeal was NOT dismissed. It was allowed, but due to the sentence imposed NOT the charges, or the verdict.
That is why there was a second trial.

Charged, tried, found guilty, appealed, re-tried, found guilty and whinged.

YSL could also have been guilty of enabling groomers and sex offenders to walk free, due to his racist, bigotted and thuggish behaviour.

How on earth do you know what I have seen.
I have not seen any "footage".

Replied: 12th Jul 2019 at 20:17

Report Abuse

Only use this form to report abuse about the post displayed above. If you have a query or wish to make a comment, do not use this form.

Your IP No. (3.142.95.121) will be logged.

* Enter the 5 digit code to the right of the input box. Don't worry if you make a mistake, you will get another chance. Your comments won't be lost.