Login   |   Register   |   

More bloody money

Started by: peawapp (5107) 

I see the engagement has been announced of Harry and Meghan ,bloody hell the biggest spongers in the country they are ,who is paying ,(no prizes) I only hope James hewitt pays his bloody share

Started: 27th Nov 2017 at 11:28

Posted by: PeterP (12419)

Another jumps on the royal gravy train to be paid for by you and me

Replied: 27th Nov 2017 at 12:50

Posted by: Tommy Two Stroke (16559)

It'll be a loverly wedding

Replied: 27th Nov 2017 at 13:09

Posted by: 0 years (inactive)

Congratulations to the happy couple.

Thanks go to Harry for his service in Afghanistan whilst the real spongers were sat on their ar*es doing nowt (and I don't mean the rest of the Royals).

Replied: 27th Nov 2017 at 13:15
Last edited by 0 years: 27th Nov 2017 at 13:16:17

Posted by: upthetims (6591)




Two more parasites creating more parasites,when will people ever learn.Media indoctrination in full flow now,makes me vomit

Replied: 27th Nov 2017 at 13:38

Posted by: grimshaw (4023) 

U T T .

Replied: 27th Nov 2017 at 18:33

Posted by: laughing gravy (inactive)

hear hear 0 years

Replied: 27th Nov 2017 at 18:47

Posted by: Handsomeminer (3126)

More chance of me being shot in Wigan than he wits lad

Replied: 27th Nov 2017 at 19:13

Posted by: laughing gravy (inactive)

1st tour he was on the ground actively fighting, 2nd tour he was flying a apache helicopter..

Replied: 27th Nov 2017 at 19:19

Posted by: 0 years (inactive)

Quite LG,

Also, Harry's support of the Invictus games should attract nothing but admiration for his efforts.......unless of course the judge of these efforts is ignorant.

BTW, did you get my post on another site last night?

Replied: 27th Nov 2017 at 20:00

Posted by: Tommy Two Stroke (16559)

The yanks are going to go mental over this, because he is marrying an American woman, because it is said that our Queen is the unofficial Queen of America, because the Americans are potty about the British Royal family, so come wedding time, there will be thousands of the buggers over here and it comes at a good time, with Brexit happening and all that and us wanting to trade 'directly' with the rest of the world, I noticed in the interview they gave that the 'Commonwealth' was mentioned, as in the 'British Commonwealth' so with us wanting trade deals with the world, especially with America, this could not have come at a better time

And on about who is paying for it, this wedding will bring in billions for this country, from increased tourism, to trade deals etc

It is good news all round for Britain

Replied: 27th Nov 2017 at 20:22

Posted by: Diston (251)

Give it five years.

Replied: 27th Nov 2017 at 20:31

Posted by: broady (inactive)

Congratulations to them both. I am sure some on here would prefer to see Obama’s daughter in the press. God save the Queen.

Replied: 27th Nov 2017 at 20:34

Posted by: laughing gravy (inactive)

yeah 0 years lol

Replied: 27th Nov 2017 at 20:43

Posted by: 0 years (inactive)

Replied: 27th Nov 2017 at 20:44

Posted by: aussie94 (2397)

Touch yer forelocks get down on yer knees to yer betters as another bludger gets on your backs. harry seems a nice bloke but he is a part of a system that ensures privillege is sustained at the disadvantage of working class. Enjoy the theater you will pay for it . how sad in 2017

Replied: 28th Nov 2017 at 01:03
Last edited by aussie94: 28th Nov 2017 at 01:07:20

Posted by: kathpressey (5710) 

but I expect the wedding will bring in lots of tourists...

Replied: 28th Nov 2017 at 08:52

Posted by: spud1 (inactive)

It will bring a lot more money in than out,and it's excellent news regarding Brexit.

Replied: 28th Nov 2017 at 10:28

Posted by: fossil (7728)

Good luck to them both,I think we are able to locate parasites a lot closer to home to be honest!

Replied: 28th Nov 2017 at 12:34

Posted by: Stardelta (inactive)

Agreed!!

Replied: 28th Nov 2017 at 12:38

Posted by: ena1958 (6334)

Great news for the country.

Replied: 28th Nov 2017 at 13:00

Posted by: tonker (29779) 

I'd like to see their faces if she produces a blackie baby in the next couple of years!

Replied: 28th Nov 2017 at 22:45

Posted by: upthetims (6591)




TONKS!!!!!!!!!!!

Replied: 1st Dec 2017 at 12:22

Posted by: peawapp (5107) 

Tonker has a point, remember what happened to His mother

Replied: 2nd Dec 2017 at 13:53

Posted by: mindar (1334)

Wasn't Queen Charlotte of African descent? She presented George 3rd with 15 children.

Replied: 2nd Dec 2017 at 15:22

Posted by: Dave xl5 (477) 

My brother is a big monarchist, and when we used to fall out about them, he would always say,
“they don't have the freedom like you have. They can't just go off and shop around Woolworth's like you”. Oh the drawbacks to wealth power and privilege..

Replied: 6th Dec 2017 at 13:22

Posted by: mindar (1334)

I dont suppose many of you will be targeted by fanatics. George is just 4 years old. Just imagine him living the rest of his life with this sort of thing.

George

Replied: 6th Dec 2017 at 14:30

Posted by: fossil (7728)

Peawapp ,I would love to know what happened to tonkers mother as well😀

Replied: 6th Dec 2017 at 20:52

Posted by: tonker (29779) 

Fossil, she died in August, aged 90, as a result of having suffered a brain hemorrhage. But, I can tell you this, she wouldn't have shagged a blackie for a gold pig!

Replied: 6th Dec 2017 at 23:52

Posted by: whacker (1047)

.

Replied: 7th Dec 2017 at 04:06
Last edited by whacker: 13th Dec 2017 at 15:05:23

Posted by: hugh wilson (66)

At 90, probably not - but who knows - maybe when she was a bit younger???

Replied: 12th Dec 2017 at 16:50

Posted by: PeterP (12419)

Freeloaders at it going to church, DM put price tag on their clothes/attire over £10000 between two of them Who payed for that lot and is it not a kick in the teeth for the folk who had to rely on food banks over the feastive season

Replied: 25th Dec 2017 at 19:20

Posted by: laughing gravy (inactive)

no mention of footballers earning 300 grand a week then anybody

Replied: 25th Dec 2017 at 20:19

Posted by: bridger (inactive)

They paid for by the taxpayer with no say in it then?

Replied: 25th Dec 2017 at 21:29

Posted by: tonker (29779) 

Laughing Gravy's footballer will pay more tax than 'them men' can spend on clothes!

Replied: 25th Dec 2017 at 21:47

Posted by: Stardelta (inactive)

Freeloaders Peter?
I will bet next years salary that those people do more for charity in a week than you have in your entire life!

Replied: 25th Dec 2017 at 22:03
Last edited by Stardelta: 26th Dec 2017 at 11:09:24

Posted by: laughing gravy (inactive)

yes bridger they are paid for by the tax payers if tax payers did not watch football they would not be on 300 grand a week,i thought you were clever

Replied: 25th Dec 2017 at 22:23
Last edited by laughing gravy: 25th Dec 2017 at 22:24:12

Posted by: bridger (inactive)

You missed the key bit. Allow me to help.

They paid for by the taxpayer with no say in it then?

As in, you can choose not to pay for Sky, go watching matches, buying club merchandise, etc. Is there a box on the tax returns form that says 'I wish to opt out of paying towards the Royal Family and their associated hangers on'?

Know that thing you say, 'it's not often I'm wrong, but I'm reet again'?

Replied: 25th Dec 2017 at 22:27

Posted by: Tommy Two Stroke (16559)

Yoo royal haters have not got a bloody cloo have you, our royal family brings in billions of pounds in revenue to this country every year, the Queen as held the former British Empire together in the form of the British Commonwealth, which is now called the 'Commonwealth of Nations' and very important it is too, especially with Brexit happening soon ...

She is known as the unofficial Queen of America because the Americans adore our Royal Family, they look on Britain as their mother country ...

Yoo royal haters really are thick aren't you, thick as pig poo, there are more brains in a flea's little toe nail, than there is in your heads ...

Replied: 25th Dec 2017 at 22:44

Posted by: chatty (9774)

The French ditched their royals years ago and you can still visit their palaces and they get tens of millions more visitors per year than Britian.

Replied: 25th Dec 2017 at 22:53
Last edited by chatty: 25th Dec 2017 at 22:54:34

Posted by: Tommy Two Stroke (16559)

No they don't ...

Like I said you royal haters baven't got a clue ...

Replied: 25th Dec 2017 at 23:01

Posted by: chatty (9774)

France has more tourists than any other country in the world, fact.

Replied: 25th Dec 2017 at 23:05

Posted by: Tommy Two Stroke (16559)

Proove it ,,, fact

Replied: 25th Dec 2017 at 23:11

Posted by: grimshaw (4023) 

Spot on chatty.

Paris the most visited city and versailies the most visited palace..

Replied: 25th Dec 2017 at 23:12

Posted by: Tommy Two Stroke (16559)

grimshaw

No it's not you are talking shit

Replied: 25th Dec 2017 at 23:16

Posted by: chatty (9774)

Replied: 25th Dec 2017 at 23:18

Posted by: Tommy Two Stroke (16559)

Wikipedia

WIKIPEDIA

I don't know if yoo know chatty, but anybody can edit Wikipedia ...

Never mind though, have a read of this

http://edition.cnn.com/travel/article/top-tourist-destinations-2017/index.html

Replied: 25th Dec 2017 at 23:27

Posted by: Tommy Two Stroke (16559)

Oh and chatty ......

Merry Christmas

Replied: 25th Dec 2017 at 23:28

Posted by: chatty (9774)

I am quite aware that anybody can edit Wikipedia, never the less France is the most visited country in the world, fact!

Replied: 25th Dec 2017 at 23:36

Posted by: Tommy Two Stroke (16559)

Bare denial eh ....

Yoo stick with your Wikipedia crap ....

I would rather trust CNN

Replied: 25th Dec 2017 at 23:38

Posted by: chatty (9774)

What does your CNN website say is the most visited country in the world?

Replied: 25th Dec 2017 at 23:50

Posted by: chatty (9774)

Replied: 25th Dec 2017 at 23:57

Posted by: Tommy Two Stroke (16559)

I think I will stick to an 'accredited' and respected news organisation, such as CNN not some obscure unknown websites

Replied: 26th Dec 2017 at 00:30

Posted by: tonker (29779) 

Bangkok has been the most visited city in The World for the last two years at least!

Replied: 26th Dec 2017 at 00:52

Posted by: Tommy Two Stroke (16559)

Bloody France the most visited country in the world

I mean WHY

Eiffel Tower ?

The Loovre ?

Where ?



Replied: 26th Dec 2017 at 08:07

Posted by: chatty (9774)

Just because you don't like the answer, that makes it wrong?

Replied: 26th Dec 2017 at 08:45
Last edited by chatty: 26th Dec 2017 at 08:49:14

Posted by: chatty (9774)

Even tonkers having trouble telling the difference between cities and countries, must be the Sherry.

Replied: 26th Dec 2017 at 08:52

Posted by: gaffer (8403) 

Paris benefits from international day trippers from neighbouring countries. In terms of overnight visitors and spending London is ahead.
Tonker is correct with Bangkok being at the top of the list.

London

Replied: 26th Dec 2017 at 10:53

Posted by: chatty (9774)

Still waiting for someone to show me that France isn't the most visited COUNTRY in the world.

Replied: 26th Dec 2017 at 11:07

Posted by: Tommy Two Stroke (16559)

chatty

I could say the same couldn't I ?

"Still waiting for someone to show me that Iceland (or any other country) isn't the most visited COUNTRY in the world"

I think the 'onus' is on you to prove that your fact is a fact

Replied: 26th Dec 2017 at 11:36

Posted by: laughing gravy (inactive)

i was not wrong footballers get paid 300 grand a week due to fans going to matches and buying merchandise and they dont have anysay in the matter,if the club asked me how much they should get paid i would say the average wage!! but no the clubs chuck big wages at um without asking the fans same a royalty is it not, now are going to say i'm right?

Replied: 26th Dec 2017 at 11:43

Posted by: Tommy Two Stroke (16559)

laughing gravy

You are right, footballers get paid to much money

Replied: 26th Dec 2017 at 11:47

Posted by: chatty (9774)

I can only show you the evidence several times over, no one else has any reason to believe the evidence to be wrong, if you don't want to believe it just stick your head in the sand it will still be there when you pull it back out.

Replied: 26th Dec 2017 at 12:25

Posted by: laughing gravy (inactive)

when am i getting my money chatty?

Replied: 26th Dec 2017 at 12:52

Posted by: chatty (9774)

Poor lamb, has me on "ignore" yet still follows me all over the internet.

Replied: 26th Dec 2017 at 12:55

Posted by: GOLDEN BEAR (6780) 

Now ,Now ,Lads come on shake hands and agree to disagree ,there is no room for this back-iting is there?

Replied: 26th Dec 2017 at 14:43

Posted by: tonker (29779) 

My mate's son in law is a footballer. He used to get £4,400 a week, until they were promoted into the Premiership division. I think he's got a rise!

Actually, I don't think they are in the Premiership, I don't really know much about football. I think they're in what used to be the first division? But he spends a lot of money. He used to play for Manchester City!


What's the EFL division then? Is it like the Northern league?

Replied: 26th Dec 2017 at 18:44
Last edited by tonker: 27th Dec 2017 at 13:39:07

 

Note: You must login to use this feature.

If you haven't registered, why not join now?. Registration is free.